Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23922233›Full record

ReviewHuman molecular genetics2013

The applications of single-cell genomics.

Michael Lovett

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human molecular genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Identification of the CD8Translational cancer research · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Platforms for Single-Cell Collection and Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. A new toolbox for assessing single cells.Annual review of chemical and biomolecular engineering · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Michael Lovett

Funding

Gene Expression Profiling of the Development Inner EarR01DC005632 · NIDCD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LOVETT, MICHAEL · 2003 to 2006
$1.2M
Genomic approaches to inner ear hair cell regenerationRC1DC010677 · NIDCD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LOVETT, MICHAEL · 2009 to 2010
$996k
NOVEL HUMAN ORAL &CRANIOFACIAL GENESN01DE092630 · NIDCR · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LOVETT, MICHAEL · 1999 to 2000
$967k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC05632NIDCD NIH HHS RC1DC010677NIDCR NIH HHS N01DE92630
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We all start out as a single totipotent cell that is programmed to produce a multicellular organism. How do individual cells make those complex developmental switches? How do single cells within a tissue or organ differ, how do they coordinate their actions or go astray in a disease process? These are long-standing and fundamental questions in biology that are now becoming tractable because of advances in microfluidics, DNA amplification and DNA sequencing. Methods for studying single-cell transcriptomes (or at least the polyadenylated mRNA fraction of it) are by far the furthest ahead and reveal remarkable heterogeneity between morphologically identical cells. The analysis of genomic DNA variation is not far behind. The other 'omics' of single cells pose greater technological obstacles, but they are progressing and promise to yield highly integrated large data sets in the near future.

Indexed as

Single-Cell AnalysisTranscriptomeCell Physiological PhenomenaGene Expression ProfilingGenetic VariationGenomicsMetabolomicsProteomicsSystems Biology

Identifiers

PMID23922233
PMCPMC3782075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.