ReviewBriefings in functional genomics2013
Epigenetic mechanisms and developmental choice hierarchies in T-lymphocyte development.
Review in Briefings in functional genomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Causal Gene Regulatory Network Modeling and Genomics: Second-Generation Challenges.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2019Article
- Encounters across networks: Windows into principles of genomic regulation.Marine genomics · 2019Article
- Transient T-bet expression functionally specifies a distinct T follicular helper subset.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2018Article
- Fitting structure to function in gene regulatory networks.History and philosophy of the life sciences · 2017Article
- Lunatic, Manic, and Radical Fringe Each Promote T and B Cell Development.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2016Article
- Transcription Factor Repertoire of Homeostatic Eosinophilopoiesis.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Three interlocking problems in gene regulation are: how to explain genome-wide targeting of transcription factors in different cell types, how prior transcription factor action can establish an 'epigenetic state' that changes the options for future transcription factor action, and how directly a sequence of developmental decisions can be memorialized in a hierarchy of repression structures applied to key genes of the 'paths not taken'. This review uses the finely staged process of T-cell lineage commitment as a test case in which to examine how changes in developmental status are reflected in changes in transcription factor expression, transcription factor binding distribution across genomic sites, and chromatin modification. These are evaluated in a framework of reciprocal effects of previous chromatin structure features on transcription factor access and of transcription factor binding on other factors and on future chromatin structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.