Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23922059›Full record

Trial reportCancer2013

Ofatumumab-based chemoimmunotherapy is effective and well tolerated in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

Tait Shanafelt, Mark C Lanasa, Timothy G Call, Anne W Beaven, Jose F Leis, Betsy LaPlant, Deborah Bowen, Michael Conte, Diane F Jelinek, Curtis A Hanson and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. [Biologics].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2016
    Review
  9. Emerging Therapies for Rheumatoid Arthritis.Rheumatology and therapy · 2016
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. New antibody approaches to lymphoma therapy.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Dosage error in article text
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tait ShanafeltMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Mark C Lanasa
Timothy G Call
Anne W Beaven
Jose F Leis
Betsy LaPlant
Deborah Bowen
Michael Conte
Diane F Jelinek
Curtis A Hanson
Neil E Kay
Clive S Zent
Mayo Clinic · USDuke University · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Felicity Enders · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
NCI NIH HHS L30 CA117573NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough rituximab-based chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) has substantially improved clinical outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), only 40% to 50% of patients achieve a complete remission (CR). There remains interest in identifying new approaches to improve the effectiveness of CIT. Ofatumumab is a fully human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody with greater apparent single-agent activity than rituximab in CLL patients.

methodsPreviously untreated CLL patients in need of therapy received 6 cycles of CIT induction with pentostatin, cyclophosphamide, and ofatumumab (PCO) followed by response assessment.

resultsOf the 48 patients enrolled, 77% completed PCO induction. Adverse events during induction included grade 3+ hematologic toxicity (27%) and grade 3+ nonhematologic toxicity (23%). Median CD4 count after induction and 6 months later were 186 × 10(6)/L and 272 × 10(6) /L. The overall response rate was 96% (46 of 48 patients), and the CR rate was 46% (22 of 48 patients). Among the 38 patients who underwent minimal residual disease evaluation, 7 (18%) were negative for minimal residual disease. After median follow-up of 24 months, 10 (21%) patients have progressed and 8 (17%) have required retreatment. The efficacy and toxicity of ofatumumab-based CIT compare favorably to our historical trials of rituximab-based CIT using an identical chemotherapy backbone (n = 64). Time to retreatment also appeared longer for ofatumumab-based CIT (free of retreatment at 24 months: 86% [95% confidence interval = 75-99] versus 68% [95% confidence interval = 56-81] for rituximab-based CIT).

conclusionsOfatumumab-based CIT is well tolerated in patients with previously untreated CLL. The efficacy of ofatumumab-based CIT compares favorably to historical trials of rituximab-based CIT, suggesting randomized trials comparing ofatumumab-based CIT and rituximab-based CIT should be considered.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCohort StudiesCombined Modality TherapyCyclophosphamideFemaleHumansImmunotherapyLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedCyclophosphamideofatumumabPentostatinRituximabchemoimmunotherapychronic lymphocytic leukemiafludarabineofatumumabpentostatinrituximabsmall lymphocytic lymphomatreatment

Identifiers

PMID23922059
PMCPMC3894149
OpenAlexW1829212672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.