ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2014
What do we know and not know about mirabegron, a novel β3 agonist, in the treatment of overactive bladder?
Review in International urogynecology journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnosis and Non-Surgical Management of Urinary Incontinence - A Literature Review with Recommendations for Practice.International journal of general medicine · 2021Review
- The efficacy and tolerability of mirabegron, a β3 adrenoceptor agonist, in patients with symptoms of overactive bladder.Therapeutic advances in urology · 2016Review
- Third-line treatment for overactive bladder: should mirabegron be tried before intravesical botulinum toxin A therapy?International urogynecology journal · 2015Article
- Postmenopausal overactive bladder.Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review · 2014Article
- Mixed urinary incontinence: international urogynecological association research and development committee opinion.International urogynecology journal · 2014Review
- Inaccuracies in the recently published review on mirabegron.International urogynecology journal · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisMirabegron is a novel β3-adrenoceptor agonist recently approved by Japanese, American, and European authorities for overactive bladder (OAB) therapy. Here we review existing knowledge on this new class of medication, analyze existing literature on the topic, and make recommendations regarding its administration and necessary future studies.
methodsWe reviewed the current literature and analyzed mirabegron efficacy, safety, and suitability for treating OAB symptoms. We performed a systematic search of Medline/PubMed, and Embase. Studies exploring mechanisms involved in the effects of mirabegron were included. Searches were limited to the English language.
resultsTwo phase II and two large-scale phase III multinational randomized controlled trials have supported mirabegron efficacy and tolerability with up to 12 weeks of therapy in OAB patients. The reported frequency and severity of treatment-emergent and serious adverse events were similar to antimuscarinics but with more than threefold lower incidence of dry mouth than with tolterodine. However, effects on the cardiovascular system, cognitive functions, pharmacokinetic interactions with other drugs, and long-term adverse events have not yet been fully investigated.
conclusionAnticholinergic drugs should remain the first-line pharmacologic treatment for OAB until head-to-head comparative study eventually shows that mirabegron has equivalent or superior efficacy. However, it seems logical to use mirabegron as second-line treatment of OAB in patients who are poor responders or intolerant to anticholinergics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.