A comment on 'Changes in bone mineral density in women following 1-year gastric bypass surgery' published by Casagrande DS et al.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Unraveling adipose tissue proteomic landscapes in severe obesity: insights into metabolic complications and potential biomarkers.American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism · 2023
   Article
2. Proteomic Signatures of Human Visceral and Subcutaneous Adipocytes.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2022
   Observational
3. The risk of sarcopenia 24 months after bariatric surgery - assessment by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA): a prospective study.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Changes in bone mineral density in women following 1-year gastric bypass surgery, published by Casagrande DS et al.--reply.2013
• Comment on
  Changes in bone mineral density in women following 1-year gastric bypass surgery.2012

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as