Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23921840›Full record

ArticleJAMA internal medicine2013

Use of antihypertensive medications and breast cancer risk among women aged 55 to 74 years.

Christopher I Li, Janet R Daling, Mei-Tzu C Tang, Kara L Haugen, Peggy L Porter, Kathleen E Malone

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Systemic Sclerosis Association with Malignancy.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher I LiDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Janet R Daling
Mei-Tzu C Tang
Kara L Haugen
Peggy L Porter
Kathleen E Malone
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · US

Funding

Depo-Provera and Breast Cancer: Epidemiology/PathologyR01CA105041 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI LI, CHRISTOPHER I · 2005 to 2009
$3.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA105041NCI NIH HHS R01-CA105041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceAntihypertensive agents are the most commonly prescribed class of medications in the United States. Evidence regarding the relationship between different types of antihypertensives and breast cancer risk is sparse and inconsistent, and prior studies have lacked the capacity to assess impacts of long-term use.

objectiveTo evaluate associations between use of various classes of antihypertensive medications and risks of invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast cancers among postmenopausal women. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsPopulation-based case-control study in the 3-county Seattle-Puget Sound metropolitan area. Participants were women aged 55 to 74 years, 880 of them with invasive ductal breast cancer, 1027 with invasive lobular breast cancer, and 856 with no cancer serving as controls. EXPOSURES: Recency and duration of use of antihypertensive medications. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Risks of invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast cancers.

resultsCurrent use of calcium-channel blockers for 10 or more years was associated with higher risks of ductal breast cancer (odds ratio [OR], 2.4; 95% CI, 1.2-4.9) (P= .04 for trend) and lobular breast cancer (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.3-5.3) (P= .01 for trend). This relationship did not vary appreciably by type of calcium-channel blocker used (short-acting vs long-acting, dihydropyridines vs non-dihydropyridines). In contrast, use of diuretics, β-blockers, and angiotensin II antagonists were not associated with risk. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: While some studies have suggested a positive association between calcium-channel blocker use and breast cancer risk, this is the first study to observe that long-term current use of calcium-channel blockers in particular are associated with breast cancer risk. Additional research is needed to confirm this finding and to evaluate potential underlying biological mechanisms.

Indexed as

PostmenopauseAgedAntihypertensive AgentsBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularFemaleHumansHypertensionIncidenceMiddle AgedOdds RatioRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSurvival RateAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID23921840
PMCPMC4112594
OpenAlexW2068651326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.