ArticleJAMA internal medicine2013
Use of antihypertensive medications and breast cancer risk among women aged 55 to 74 years.
Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 126 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reverse Onco-Cardiology: What Is the Evidence for Breast Cancer? A Systematic Review of the Literature.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Pooled it
- Cardio-Oncology: A Myriad of Relationships Between Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Association between blood pressure and risk of cancer development: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.Scientific reports · 2019Pooled it
- Hypertension and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2017Pooled it
- Calcium channel blockers and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of 17 observational studies.PloS one · 2014Pooled it
- Inulin Supplementation Reduces Systolic Blood Pressure in Women with Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2019Trial
- Report of the FDA's expert panel on hormone therapy.Menopause (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Review
- Cancer and Hypertension: Shared Mechanisms, Treatment Interactions, and Clinical Management.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Factors Associated With Male Breast Cancer Incidence Among Prostate Cancer Survivors: Real World Evidence From Veterans Affairs National Prostate Cancer Data Core.The Prostate · 2026Article
- Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness of Calcium Channel Blockers in Hypertension: A Systematic Review.Drug, healthcare and patient safety · 2026Review
- Impact of Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Agents on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk in Patients with Fatty Liver Disease and Diabetes.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Epidemiology, risk factors and mechanism of breast cancer and atrial fibrillation.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2024Review
- Targeting the core program of metastasis with a novel drug combination.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Antihypertensive drug targets and breast cancer risk: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.European journal of epidemiology · 2024Article
- Article
- Use of calcium channel blockers and risk of breast cancer among women aged 55 years and older: a nationwide population-based cohort study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2023Article
- Review
- The risk of second primary malignancies in colorectal cancer patients using calcium channel blockers.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Systemic Sclerosis Association with Malignancy.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
importanceAntihypertensive agents are the most commonly prescribed class of medications in the United States. Evidence regarding the relationship between different types of antihypertensives and breast cancer risk is sparse and inconsistent, and prior studies have lacked the capacity to assess impacts of long-term use.
objectiveTo evaluate associations between use of various classes of antihypertensive medications and risks of invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast cancers among postmenopausal women. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsPopulation-based case-control study in the 3-county Seattle-Puget Sound metropolitan area. Participants were women aged 55 to 74 years, 880 of them with invasive ductal breast cancer, 1027 with invasive lobular breast cancer, and 856 with no cancer serving as controls. EXPOSURES: Recency and duration of use of antihypertensive medications. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Risks of invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast cancers.
resultsCurrent use of calcium-channel blockers for 10 or more years was associated with higher risks of ductal breast cancer (odds ratio [OR], 2.4; 95% CI, 1.2-4.9) (P= .04 for trend) and lobular breast cancer (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.3-5.3) (P= .01 for trend). This relationship did not vary appreciably by type of calcium-channel blocker used (short-acting vs long-acting, dihydropyridines vs non-dihydropyridines). In contrast, use of diuretics, β-blockers, and angiotensin II antagonists were not associated with risk. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: While some studies have suggested a positive association between calcium-channel blocker use and breast cancer risk, this is the first study to observe that long-term current use of calcium-channel blockers in particular are associated with breast cancer risk. Additional research is needed to confirm this finding and to evaluate potential underlying biological mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.