Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23921780›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of obesity (2005)2013

Cost-effectiveness of a primary care intervention to treat obesity.

A G Tsai, T A Wadden, S Volger, D B Sarwer, M Vetter, S Kumanyika, R I Berkowitz, L K Diewald, J Perez, J Lavenberg and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of obesity (2005), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

A G TsaiDivision of General Internal Medicine, Anschutz Health and Wellness Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. adam.tsai@ucdenver.edu
T A Wadden
S Volger
D B Sarwer
M Vetter
S Kumanyika
R I Berkowitz
L K Diewald
J Perez
J Lavenberg
E R Panigrahi
H A Glick
University of Pennsylvania · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USHaverford College · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

Improving the Management of Obesity in Primary Care PracticeU01HL087072 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WADDEN, THOMAS A. · 2006 to 2010
$5.4M
IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF OBESITY MANAGEMENTK24DK065018 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WADDEN, THOMAS A. · 2003 to 2013
$1.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL087072NHLBI NIH HHS U01-HL087072NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK065018NIDDK NIH HHS K24-DK065018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData on the cost-effectiveness of the behavioral treatment of obesity are not conclusive. The cost-effectiveness of treatment in primary care settings is particularly relevant.

methodsWe conducted a within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of a primary care-based obesity intervention. Study participants were randomized to: Usual Care (UC; quarterly visits with their primary care provider); Brief Lifestyle Counseling (BLC; quarterly provider visits plus monthly weight loss counseling visits) or Enhanced Brief Lifestyle Counseling (EBLC; all above interventions, plus choice of meal replacements or weight loss medication). A health-care payer perspective was used. Intervention costs were estimated from tracking data obtained prospectively. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated with the EuroQol-5D. We estimated cost per kilogram-year of weight loss and cost per QALY.

resultsWeight losses after 2 years were 1.7, 2.9 and 4.6 kg for UC, BLC and EBLC, respectively (P=0.003 for comparison of EBLC vs UC). The incremental cost per kilogram-year lost was $292 for EBLC compared with UC (95% confidence interval (CI): $219-$437). The short-term incremental cost per QALY was $115,397, but the 95% CI were undefined. Comparison of short-term cost per kg with published estimates of longer-term cost per QALY suggested that the intervention could be cost-effective over the long term (≥ 10 years).

conclusionsA primary care intervention that includes monthly counseling visits and a choice of meal replacements or weight loss medication could be a cost-effective treatment for obesity over the long term. However, additional studies are needed on the cost-effectiveness of behavioral treatment of obesity.

Indexed as

Directive CounselingPrimary Health CareRisk Reduction BehaviorWeight LossCost-Benefit AnalysisDiet, ReducingFemaleHumansMaleMedicaidMedicareMiddle AgedObesityPennsylvaniaQuality-Adjusted Life YearsQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID23921780
PMCPMC3786743
OpenAlexW2033268404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.