ArticleHeredity2013
An evaluation of a novel estimator of linkage disequilibrium.
Article in Heredity, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Linkage Disequilibrium and Effective Population Size of Buffalo Populations of Iran, Turkey, Pakistan, and Egypt Using a Medium Density SNP Array.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Consequences of Single-Locus and Tightly Linked Genomic Architectures for Evolutionary Responses to Environmental Change.The Journal of heredity · 2020Article
- On the Extent of Linkage Disequilibrium in the Genome of Farm Animals.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Review
- Patterns of Genetic Structure and Linkage Disequilibrium in a Large Collection of Pea Germplasm.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The analysis of systems involving many loci is important in population and quantitative genetics. An important problem is the study of linkage disequilibrium (LD), a concept relevant in genome-enabled prediction of quantitative traits and in exploration of marker-phenotype associations. This article introduces a new estimator of a LD parameter (ρ(2)) that is much easier to compute than a maximum likelihood (or Bayesian) estimate of a tetra-choric correlation. We examined the conjecture that the sampling distribution of the estimator of ρ(2) could be less frequency dependent than that of the estimator of r(2), a widely used metric for assessing LD. This was done via an empirical evaluation of LD in 806 Holstein-Friesian cattle using 771 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers and of HapMap III data on 21,991 SNPs (chromosome 3) observed in 88 unrelated individuals from Tuscany. Also, 1600 haplotypes over a region of 1 Mb simulated under the coalescent were used to estimate LD using the two measures. Subsequently, a simulation study compared the new estimator with that of r(2) using several scenarios of LD and allelic frequencies. From these studies, it is concluded that ρ(2) provides a useful metric for the study of LD as the distribution of its estimator is less frequency dependent than that of the standard estimator of r(2).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.