Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23921619›Full record

ArticleAIDS (London, England)2013

Can the UNAIDS modes of transmission model be improved? A comparison of the original and revised model projections using data from a setting in west Africa.

Holly J Prudden, Charlotte H Watts, Peter Vickerman, Natalia Bobrova, Lori Heise, Michael K Ogungbemi, Amaka Momah, James F Blanchard, Anna M Foss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. PrEP implementation research in Africa: what is new?Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pre-exposure prophylaxis in Southern Africa: feasible or not?Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2015
    Article
  12. PrEP Implementation Science: State-of-the-Art and Research Agenda.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Holly J PruddenaLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK bNigeria National Agency for the Control of AIDS, Abuja, Nigeria cUniversity of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Charlotte H Watts
Peter Vickerman
Natalia Bobrova
Lori Heise
Michael K Ogungbemi
Amaka Momah
James F Blanchard
Anna M Foss
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Manitoba · CANational Agency for the Control of AIDS · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe UNAIDS modes of transmission model (MoT) is a user-friendly model, developed to predict the distribution of new HIV infections among different subgroups. The model has been used in 29 countries to guide interventions. However, there is the risk that the simplifications inherent in the MoT produce misleading findings. Using input data from Nigeria, we compare projections from the MoT with those from a revised model that incorporates additional heterogeneity.

methodsWe revised the MoT to explicitly incorporate brothel and street-based sex-work, transactional sex, and HIV-discordant couples. Both models were parameterized using behavioural and epidemiological data from Cross River State, Nigeria. Model projections were compared, and the robustness of the revised model projections to different model assumptions, was investigated.

resultsThe original MoT predicts 21% of new infections occur in most-at-risk-populations (MARPs), compared with 45% (40-75%, 95% Crl) once additional heterogeneity and updated parameterization is incorporated. Discordant couples, a subgroup previously not explicitly modelled, are predicted to contribute a third of new HIV infections. In addition, the new findings suggest that women engaging in transactional sex may be an important but previously less recognized risk group, with 16% of infections occurring in this subgroup.

conclusionThe MoT is an accessible model that can inform intervention priorities. However, the current model may be potentially misleading, with our comparisons in Nigeria suggesting that the model lacks resolution, making it challenging for the user to correctly interpret the nature of the epidemic. Our findings highlight the need for a formal review of the MoT.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalNigeriaSexual BehaviorYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23921619
PMCPMC3815012
OpenAlexW2034240793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.