Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23919586›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2013

A nanobody binding to non-amyloidogenic regions of the protein human lysozyme enhances partial unfolding but inhibits amyloid fibril formation.

Erwin De Genst, Pak-Ho Chan, Els Pardon, Shang-Te D Hsu, Janet R Kumita, John Christodoulou, Linda Menzer, Dimitri Y Chirgadze, Carol V Robinson, Serge Muyldermans and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Single Molecule Characterization of Amyloid Oligomers.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Nanobodies: Chemical Functionalization Strategies and Intracellular Applications.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Nanobodies as Probes for Protein Dynamics in Vitro and in Cells.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Erwin De Genst *Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, U.K.
Pak-Ho Chan *Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, U.K.
Els PardonDepartment of Structural Biology, Vlaams Interuniversitair Instituut voor Biotechnologie VIB, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Shang-Te D HsuInstitute of Bioinformatics and Structural Biology, National Tsing Hua University, 101, Section 2, Kuang-Fu Road, Hsinchu, 30013, Taiwan.
Janet R KumitaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, U.K.
John ChristodoulouInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology, University College London and Birkbeck College, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, U.K.
Linda MenzerLaboratory of Enzymology and Protein Folding, Centre for Protein Engineering, Institute of Chemistry, University of Liege, B-4000 Liege (Sart Tilman), Belgium.
Dimitri Y ChirgadzeDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, 80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, U.K.
Carol V RobinsonPhysical and Theoretical Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QZ, U.K.
Serge MuyldermansDepartment of Structural Biology, Vlaams Interuniversitair Instituut voor Biotechnologie VIB, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
André MatagneLaboratory of Enzymology and Protein Folding, Centre for Protein Engineering, Institute of Chemistry, University of Liege, B-4000 Liege (Sart Tilman), Belgium.
Lode WynsDepartment of Structural Biology, Vlaams Interuniversitair Instituut voor Biotechnologie VIB, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Christopher M DobsonDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, U.K.
Mireille DumoulinLaboratory of Enzymology and Protein Folding, Centre for Protein Engineering, Institute of Chemistry, University of Liege, B-4000 Liege (Sart Tilman), Belgium.
University of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Liège · BEBridge University · SSHong Kong Polytechnic University · HKNational Taiwan University · TW

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E019927/1Medical Research Council G1002272Wellcome Trust 088945Wellcome Trust 097806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report the effects of the interaction of two camelid antibody fragments, generally called nanobodies, namely cAb-HuL5 and a stabilized and more aggregation-resistant variant cAb-HuL5G obtained by protein engineering, on the properties of two amyloidogenic variants of human lysozyme, I56T and D67H, whose deposition in vital organs including the liver, kidney, and spleen is associated with a familial non-neuropathic systemic amyloidosis. Both NMR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallographic studies reveal that cAb-HuL5 binds to the α-domain, one of the two lobes of the native lysozyme structure. The binding of cAb-HuL5/cAb-HuL5G strongly inhibits fibril formation by the amyloidogenic variants; it does not, however, suppress the locally transient cooperative unfolding transitions, characteristic of these variants, in which the β-domain and the C-helix unfold and which represents key early intermediate species in the formation of amyloid fibrils. Therefore, unlike two other nanobodies previously described, cAb-HuL5/cAb-HuL5G does not inhibit fibril formation via the restoration of the global cooperativity of the native structure of the lysozyme variants to that characteristic of the wild-type protein. Instead, it inhibits a subsequent step in the assembly of the fibrils, involving the unfolding and structural reorganization of the α-domain. These results show that nanobodies can protect against the formation of pathogenic aggregates at different stages in the structural transition of a protein from the soluble native state into amyloid fibrils, illustrating their value as structural probes to study the molecular mechanisms of amyloid fibril formation. Combined with their amenability to protein engineering techniques to improve their stability and solubility, these findings support the suggestion that nanobodies can potentially be developed as therapeutics to combat protein misfolding diseases.

Indexed as

AmyloidCrystallography, X-RayHumansMuramidaseMutationNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProtein BindingProtein DenaturationProtein FoldingProtein StabilityProtein Structure, TertiaryRecombinant ProteinsSingle-Domain AntibodiesSolubilityAmyloidMuramidaseRecombinant ProteinsSingle-Domain Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID23919586
PMCPMC4612432
OpenAlexW2028868321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.