Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23919296›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2013

Generalist solutions to complex problems: generating practice-based evidence--the example of managing multi-morbidity.

Joanne Reeve, Tom Blakeman, George K Freeman, Larry A Green, Paul A James, Peter Lucassen, Carmel M Martin, Joachim P Sturmberg, Chris van Weel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The Lifeworld of the Complex Care Hospital Doctor: A Complex Adaptive Phenomenological Study.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Practical wisdom in complex medical practices: a critical proposal.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2019
    Article
  19. Revitalising general practice: unleashing our inner scholar.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  20. Elaboration of the Gothenburg model of person-centred care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Joanne ReeveUniversity of Liverpool, B122 Waterhouse Buildings, 1-5 Brownlow St, Liverpool L693GL, UK. joanne.reeve@liv.ac.uk
Tom Blakeman
George K Freeman
Larry A Green
Paul A James
Peter Lucassen
Carmel M Martin
Joachim P Sturmberg
Chris van Weel

Funding

Department of Health NIHR/CS/009/013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA growing proportion of people are living with long term conditions. The majority have more than one. Dealing with multi-morbidity is a complex problem for health systems: for those designing and implementing healthcare as well as for those providing the evidence informing practice. Yet the concept of multi-morbidity (the presence of >2 diseases) is a product of the design of health care systems which define health care need on the basis of disease status. So does the solution lie in an alternative model of healthcare? DISCUSSION: Strengthening generalist practice has been proposed as part of the solution to tackling multi-morbidity. Generalism is a professional philosophy of practice, deeply known to many practitioners, and described as expertise in whole person medicine. But generalism lacks the evidence base needed by policy makers and planners to support service redesign. The challenge is to fill this practice-research gap in order to critically explore if and when generalist care offers a robust alternative to management of this complex problem. We need practice-based evidence to fill this gap. By recognising generalist practice as a 'complex intervention' (intervening in a complex system), we outline an approach to evaluate impact using action-research principles. We highlight the implications for those who both commission and undertake research in order to tackle this problem. SUMMARY: Answers to the complex problem of multi-morbidity won't come from doing more of the same. We need to change systems of care, and so the systems for generating evidence to support that care. This paper contributes to that work through outlining a process for generating practice-based evidence of generalist solutions to the complex problem of person-centred care for people with multi-morbidity.

Indexed as

ComorbidityEvidence-Based PracticeHealth Services Needs and DemandChronic DiseaseContinuity of Patient CareFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansMalePhysicians, Family

Identifiers

PMID23919296
PMCPMC3750615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.