ReviewScience China. Life sciences2013
New strategy for virus discovery: viruses identified in human feces in the last decade.
Review in Science China. Life sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Viromic Koch's postulates resolve iron prawn syndrome etiology.Journal of virology · 2026Article
- Encapsulation protocol for fecal microbiota transplantation.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Article
- Analysis of Bacteriophage Behavior of a Human RNA Virus, SARS-CoV-2, through the Integrated Approach of Immunofluorescence Microscopy, Proteomics and D-Amino Acid Quantification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Diagnosis of Viral Diseases Using Deep Sequencing and Metagenomics Analyses.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Shedding of SARS-CoV-2 in feces and urine and its potential role in person-to-person transmission and the environment-based spread of COVID-19.The Science of the total environment · 2020Review
- Metagenomic analysis of viral diversity in respiratory samples from patients with respiratory tract infections in Kuwait.Journal of medical virology · 2018Article
- Feasibility of Using the Mosquito Blood Meal for Rapid and Efficient Human and Animal Virus Surveillance and Discovery.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2015Article
- Metagenomic analysis of viruses in feces from unsolved outbreaks of gastroenteritis in humans.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2015Article
- Metagenomic identification of novel enteric viruses in urban wild rats and genome characterization of a group A rotavirus.The Journal of general virology · 2014Article
- Haunted with and hunting for viruses.Science China. Life sciences · 2013Article
- Retrospective Surveillance of Wastewater To Examine Seasonal Dynamics of Enterovirus Infections.mSphereArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emerging and re-emerging viruses continue to surface all over the world. Some of these viruses have the potential for rapid and global spread with high morbidity and mortality, such as the SARS coronavirus outbreak. It is extremely urgent and important to identify a novel virus near-instantaneously to develop an active preventive and/or control strategy. As a culture-independent approach, viral metagenomics has been widely used to investigate highly divergent and completely new viruses in humans, animals, and even environmental samples in the past decade. A new model of Koch's postulates, named the metagenomic Koch's postulates, has provided guidance for the study of the pathogenicity of novel viruses. This review explains the viral metagenomics strategy for virus discovery and describes viruses discovered in human feces in the past 10 years using this approach. This review also addresses issues related to the metagenomic Koch's postulates and the challenges for virus discovery in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.