Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23917805›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2014

Odors: appetizing or satiating? Development of appetite during odor exposure over time.

M G Ramaekers, S Boesveldt, C M M Lakemond, M A J S van Boekel, P A Luning

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Effect of theFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Smell the Label: Odors Influence Label Perception and Their Neural Processing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effect of theNutrients · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Influence of olfactory dysfunction on the perception of food.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M G RamaekersFood Quality and Design, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
S BoesveldtDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
C M M LakemondFood Quality and Design, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
M A J S van BoekelFood Quality and Design, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
P A LuningFood Quality and Design, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExposure to palatable food odors influences appetite responses, either promoting or inhibiting food intake. Possibly, food odors are appetizing after a short exposure (of circa 1-3 min), but become satiating over time (circa 10-20 min).

objectiveTo investigate the effect of odor exposure on general appetite and sensory-specific appetite (SSA) over time.

designIn a cross-over study, 21 unrestrained women (age: 18-45 years; BMI: 18.5-25 kg m(-2)) were exposed for 20 min to eight different odor types: five food odors, two nonfood odors and no-odor. All odors were distributed in a test room at suprathreshold levels. General appetite, SSA and salivation were measured over time.

resultsAll food odors significantly increased general appetite and SSA, compared with the no-odor condition. The nonfood odors decreased general appetite. All effects did not change over time during odor exposure. Savory odors increased the appetite for savory foods, but decreased appetite for sweet foods, and vice versa after exposure to sweet odors. Neither food odors nor nonfood odors affected salivation.

conclusionsPalatable food odors were appetizing during and after odor exposure and did not become satiating over a 20-min period. Food odors had a large impact on SSA and a small impact on general appetite. Moreover, exposure to food odors increased the appetite for congruent foods, but decreased the appetite for incongruent foods. It may be hypothesized that, once the body is prepared for intake of a certain food with a particular macronutrient composition, it is unfavorable to consume foods that are very different from the cued food.

Indexed as

OdorantsAdolescentAdultAnalysis of VarianceAppetiteChoice BehaviorCross-Over StudiesCuesEatingFeeding BehaviorFemaleFood PreferencesHumansMiddle AgedSalivationSatiation

Identifiers

PMID23917805
OpenAlexW1985353566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.