Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23917671›Full record

ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2013

Temporal relationship of serum markers and tissue damage during acute intestinal ischemia/reperfusion.

Francisco Javier Guzmán-de la Garza, Juan Manuel Ibarra-Hernández, Paula Cordero-Pérez, Pablo Villegas-Quintero, Claudia Ivette Villarreal-Ovalle, Liliana Torres-González, Norma Edith Oliva-Sosa, Gabriela Alarcón-Galván, Nancy Esthela Fernández-Garza, Linda Elsa Muñoz-Espinosa and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Biomarkers of Intestinal Injury in Colic.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  5. Acute Mesenteric Ischemia.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Serological biomarkers for acute mesenteric ischemia.Annals of translational medicine · 2019
    Review
  11. Review
  12. DifferentialFrontiers in immunology · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Differential Cultivation ofFrontiers in immunology · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francisco Javier Guzmán-de la GarzaDepartamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Nuevo León/México. drfcojguzman@hotmail.com
Juan Manuel Ibarra-Hernández
Paula Cordero-Pérez
Pablo Villegas-Quintero
Claudia Ivette Villarreal-Ovalle
Liliana Torres-González
Norma Edith Oliva-Sosa
Gabriela Alarcón-Galván
Nancy Esthela Fernández-Garza
Linda Elsa Muñoz-Espinosa
Carlos Rodrigo Cámara-Lemarroy
José Gerardo Carrillo-Arriaga
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIt is essential to identify a serological marker of injury in order to study the pathophysiology of intestinal ischemia reperfusion. In this work, we studied the evolution of several serological markers after intestinal ischemia reperfusion injury in rats. The markers of non-specific cell damage were aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransaminase, and lactic dehydrogenase, the markers of inflammation were tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-6, and interleukin-1 beta, and the markers of intestinal mucosal damage were intestinal fatty acid binding protein and D-lactate. We used Chiús classification to grade the histopathological damage.

methodsWe studied 35 Wistar rats divided into groups according to reperfusion time. The superior mesenteric artery was clamped for 30 minutes, and blood and biopsies were collected at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after reperfusion. We plotted the mean ± standard deviation and compared the baseline and maximum values for each marker using Student's t-test.

resultsThe maximum values of interleukin-1 beta and lactic dehydrogenase were present before the maximal histopathological damage. The maximum tumor necrosis factor alpha and D-lactate expressions coincided with histopathological damage. Alanine aminotransaminase and aspartate aminotransferase had a maximum expression level that increased following the histopathological damage. The maximum expressions of interluken-6 and intestinal fatty acid binding protein were not significantly different from the Sham treated group.

conclusionFor the evaluation of injury secondary to acute intestinal ischemia reperfusion with a 30 minute ischemia period, we recommend performing histopathological grading, quantification of D-lactate, which is synthesized by intestinal bacteria and is considered an indicator of mucosal injury, and quantification of tumor necrosis factor alpha as indicators of acute inflammation three hours after reperfusion.

Indexed as

AnimalsAspartate AminotransferasesBiomarkersBiopsyCytokinesDisease Models, AnimalFatty Acid-Binding ProteinsFemaleIntestinesLactate DehydrogenasesRatsRats, WistarReference ValuesReperfusion InjuryTime FactorsAspartate AminotransferasesBiomarkersCytokinesFatty Acid-Binding ProteinsLactate Dehydrogenases

Identifiers

PMID23917671
PMCPMC3715035
OpenAlexW2060658576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.