ArticleScientific reports2013
Cervical cancer screening service utilisation in UK.
Article in Scientific reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of educational intervention on the uptake of self-sampling for HPV test-based cervical cancer screening.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Concurrent utilisation of cancer screening tests in the general population aged 50-69: an analysis of the 2017 Swiss Health Survey.International journal of public health · 2026Article
- Factors associated with cervical cancer screening among women attending maternal child health clinics in Kenya.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Article
- Investigating Factors Influencing the National Cancer Screening Program among Older Individuals in Republic of Korea-Data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey VIII.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Barriers Associated with Adherence to Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women Living with HIV in Nkhatabay District, Malawi: A Mixed-Methods Study.International journal of women's health · 2024Article
- Sociodemographic characteristics, attitudes, and knowledge associated with previous screening for cervical cancer among women in western Jamaica.Infectious agents and cancer · 2023Article
- HPV and Cervical Cancer: A Review of Epidemiology and Screening Uptake in the UK.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Differential Impact of Education Level, Occupation and Marital Status on Performance of the Papanicolaou Test among Women from Various Regions in BrazilAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2019Article
- Association between patient-reported HIV status and provider recommendation for screening in an opportunistic cervical Cancer screening setting in Jos, Nigeria.BMC health services research · 2018Article
- Exploring Effective Contextual Factors for Regular Cervical Cancer Screening in Iranian Women: A Qualitative StudyAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2018Article
- Blood pressure and cholesterol level checks as dynamic interrelated screening examinations.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Determinants of a GP visit and cervical cancer screening examination in Great Britain.PloS one · 2017Article
- Breast and cervical cancer screening in Great Britain: Dynamic interrelated processes.Health economics review · 2015Article
- Utilisation of preventative health check-ups in the UK: findings from individual-level repeated cross-sectional data from 1992 to 2008.BMJ open · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates empirically how past screening behaviour, individual and household characteristics affect the current uptake of cervical cancer screening in UK. For the conceptual framework, we use a modified Grossman model which is extended for non-economic factors. A dynamic version of a random effects panel probit model with initial conditions is estimated on the balanced sub-sample of the data. The analysis sample is restricted to women of age 16 and older and grouped into different age categories with respect to the NHS Cervical Screening Programme (NHSCSP). As dataset a balanced panel data of 857 women with 11,998 observations from the British Household Panel Study (BHPS) for the period from 1992 to 2008 is used for the analysis. Results suggest show that previous screening uptake, age, partner status, employment status and a previous GP visit have a significant influence on the likelihood of the uptake of cervical cancer screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.