Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23917286›Full record

ArticleJAMA2013

Black-white differences in breast cancer outcomes among older Medicare beneficiaries: does systemic treatment matter?

Jeanne S Mandelblatt, Vanessa B Sheppard, Alfred I Neugut

Abstract readEditorialComment
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Risk of Recurrence and Mortality in a Multi-Ethnic Breast Cancer Population.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2017
    Article
  5. Medicare D Subsidies and Racial Disparities in Persistence and Adherence With Hormonal Therapy.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2016
    Article
  6. Focus on You: Cancer clinical trials perspectives.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2016
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Vanessa B Sheppard
Alfred I Neugut

Funding

Georgetown-Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translational Science (GHUUL1TR000101 · NCATS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MELLMAN, THOMAS A, VERBALIS, JOSEPH G · 2012 to 2015
$19.3M
Comparative Modeling: Informing Breast Cancer Control Practice & PolicyU01CA152958 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI BERRY, DONALD A, DE KONING, HARRY J · 2010 to 2015
$7.6M
OUTCOMES ACROSS THE SPECTRUM OF BREAST CANCER CAREU01CA088283 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MANDELBLATT, JEANNE · 2000 to 2010
$2.6M
PREDICTORS OF ADJUVANT ENDOCRINE THERAPY ADHERENCE IN WOMEN WITH BREAST CANCERR01CA154848 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI SHEPPARD, VANESSA B · 2011 to 2015
$2.5M
Cancer Control at the Intersection of Aging ResearchK05CA096940 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MANDELBLATT, JEANNE · 2002 to 2011
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000101NCI NIH HHS K05 CA096940NCI NIH HHS KO5CA96940NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154848NCI NIH HHS U01 CA088283NCI NIH HHS U01CA088283NCI NIH HHS U01 CA152958NCI NIH HHS U01CA152958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth Status DisparitiesBlack PeopleBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansWhite People

Identifiers

PMID23917286
PMCPMC4255459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.