Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23917245›Full record

ArticleMathematical biosciences2013

Impact of flow on ligand-mediated bacterial flocculation.

Sarthok Sircar, David M Bortz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mathematical biosciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mechanical Model for Catch-Bond-Mediated Cell Adhesion in Shear Flow.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Ligand-mediated adhesive mechanics of two static, deformed spheres.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2016
    Article
  4. Sticky surface: sphere-sphere adhesion dynamics.Journal of biological dynamics · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarthok SircarDepartment of Applied Mathematics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, United States.
David M Bortz

Funding

Biomechanics of Blood Stream InfectionsR01GM081702 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SOLOMON, MICHAEL J · 2009 to 2017
$3.2M
Complement C5A in Human SepsisR01GM069438 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI YOUNGER, JOHN G · 2004 to 2014
$3.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM081702-01A2NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM069438NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand the adhesion-fragmentation dynamics of bacterial aggregates (i.e., flocs), we model the aggregates as two ligand-covered rigid spheres. We develop and investigate a model for the attachment/detachment dynamics in a fluid subject to a homogeneous planar shear-flow. The binding ligands on the surface of the flocs experience attractive and repulsive surface forces in an ionic medium and exhibit finite resistance to rotation (via bond tilting). For certain range of material and fluid parameters, our results predict a nonlinear or hysteretic relationship between the binding/unbinding of the floc surface and the net floc velocity (translational plus rotational velocity). We show that the surface adhesion is promoted by increased fluid flow until a critical value, beyond which the bonds starts to yield. Moreover, adhesion is not promoted in a medium with low ionic strength, or flocs with bigger size or higher binder stiffness. The numerical simulations of floc-aggregate number density studies support these findings.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalBacterial AdhesionBacterial Physiological PhenomenaComputational BiologyElasticityFlocculationHydrodynamicsKineticsLigandsMathematical ConceptsNonlinear DynamicsLigandsAdhesionBinding kineticsBistabilityFlocculationMicro hydrodynamicsSmoluchowski coagulation equations

Identifiers

PMID23917245
PMCPMC3815709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.