Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23916863›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2013

eTACTS: a method for dynamically filtering clinical trial search results.

Riccardo Miotto, Silis Jiang, Chunhua Weng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Text Classification of Cancer Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. DQueST: dynamic questionnaire for search of clinical trials.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Semantic Web-based System for Mining Genetic Mutations in Cancer Clinical Trials.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cross-system evaluation of clinical trial search engines.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Riccardo MiottoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, United States.
Silis Jiang
Chunhua Weng

Funding

Training in Biomedical Informatics at Columbia UniversityT15LM007079 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI NOEMIE ELHADAD, GEORGE M HRIPCSAK · 1992 to 2026
$28.9M
Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000040 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GINSBERG, HENRY N · 2012 to 2015
$26.2M
Bridging the Semantic Gap Between Research Eligibility Criteria and Clinical DataR01LM009886 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WENG, CHUNHUA · 2009 to 2020
$5.3M
Developing Flexible EHR Plug-ins to Re-Engineer Clinical Care and Research WorkflowsR01LM010815 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HOMMA, SHUNICHI, WENG, CHUNHUA · 2010 to 2013
$1.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000040NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000040NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009886NLM NIH HHS R01LM009886NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010815NLM NIH HHS R01LM010815NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007079NLM NIH HHS T15LM007079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveInformation overload is a significant problem facing online clinical trial searchers. We present eTACTS, a novel interactive retrieval framework using common eligibility tags to dynamically filter clinical trial search results. MATERIALS AND

methodseTACTS mines frequent eligibility tags from free-text clinical trial eligibility criteria and uses these tags for trial indexing. After an initial search, eTACTS presents to the user a tag cloud representing the current results. When the user selects a tag, eTACTS retains only those trials containing that tag in their eligibility criteria and generates a new cloud based on tag frequency and co-occurrences in the remaining trials. The user can then select a new tag or unselect a previous tag. The process iterates until a manageable number of trials is returned. We evaluated eTACTS in terms of filtering efficiency, diversity of the search results, and user eligibility to the filtered trials using both qualitative and quantitative methods.

resultseTACTS (1) rapidly reduced search results from over a thousand trials to ten; (2) highlighted trials that are generally not top-ranked by conventional search engines; and (3) retrieved a greater number of suitable trials than existing search engines. DISCUSSION: eTACTS enables intuitive clinical trial searches by indexing eligibility criteria with effective tags. User evaluation was limited to one case study and a small group of evaluators due to the long duration of the experiment. Although a larger-scale evaluation could be conducted, this feasibility study demonstrated significant advantages of eTACTS over existing clinical trial search engines.

conclusionA dynamic eligibility tag cloud can potentially enhance state-of-the-art clinical trial search engines by allowing intuitive and efficient filtering of the search result space.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicHumansTreatment OutcomeAssociation rulesClinical trialsDynamic information filteringInformation storage and retrievalInteractive information retrievalTag cloud

Identifiers

PMID23916863
PMCPMC3843999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.