ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2013
eTACTS: a method for dynamically filtering clinical trial search results.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- A review of research on eligibility criteria for clinical trials.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2023Review
- Text Classification of Cancer Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2023Article
- EMR2vec: Bridging the gap between patient data and clinical trial.Computers & industrial engineering · 2021Article
- DQueST: dynamic questionnaire for search of clinical trials.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019Article
- Automatic classification of registered clinical trials towards the Global Burden of Diseases taxonomy of diseases and injuries.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Valx: A System for Extracting and Structuring Numeric Lab Test Comparison Statements from Text.Methods of information in medicine · 2016Article
- Case-based reasoning using electronic health records efficiently identifies eligible patients for clinical trials.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015Article
- Visual aggregate analysis of eligibility features of clinical trials.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2015Article
- A Semantic Web-based System for Mining Genetic Mutations in Cancer Clinical Trials.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2015Article
- Adaptive semantic tag mining from heterogeneous clinical research texts.Methods of information in medicine · 2015Article
- Effective Filtering of Query Results on Updated User Behavioral Profiles in Web Mining.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2015Article
- Clustering clinical trials with similar eligibility criteria features.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2014Article
- Cross-system evaluation of clinical trial search engines.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2014Article
- A distribution-based method for assessing the differences between clinical trial target populations and patient populations in electronic health records.Applied clinical informatics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveInformation overload is a significant problem facing online clinical trial searchers. We present eTACTS, a novel interactive retrieval framework using common eligibility tags to dynamically filter clinical trial search results. MATERIALS AND
methodseTACTS mines frequent eligibility tags from free-text clinical trial eligibility criteria and uses these tags for trial indexing. After an initial search, eTACTS presents to the user a tag cloud representing the current results. When the user selects a tag, eTACTS retains only those trials containing that tag in their eligibility criteria and generates a new cloud based on tag frequency and co-occurrences in the remaining trials. The user can then select a new tag or unselect a previous tag. The process iterates until a manageable number of trials is returned. We evaluated eTACTS in terms of filtering efficiency, diversity of the search results, and user eligibility to the filtered trials using both qualitative and quantitative methods.
resultseTACTS (1) rapidly reduced search results from over a thousand trials to ten; (2) highlighted trials that are generally not top-ranked by conventional search engines; and (3) retrieved a greater number of suitable trials than existing search engines. DISCUSSION: eTACTS enables intuitive clinical trial searches by indexing eligibility criteria with effective tags. User evaluation was limited to one case study and a small group of evaluators due to the long duration of the experiment. Although a larger-scale evaluation could be conducted, this feasibility study demonstrated significant advantages of eTACTS over existing clinical trial search engines.
conclusionA dynamic eligibility tag cloud can potentially enhance state-of-the-art clinical trial search engines by allowing intuitive and efficient filtering of the search result space.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.