Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23916321›Full record

Trial reportDrug and alcohol dependence2013

Methadone and buprenorphine-naloxone are effective in reducing illicit buprenorphine and other opioid use, and reducing HIV risk behavior--outcomes of a randomized trial.

David Otiashvili, Gvantsa Piralishvili, Zura Sikharulidze, George Kamkamidze, Sabrina Poole, George E Woody

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David OtiashviliAddiction Research Centre, Alternative Georgia, Tbilisi 0177, Georgia; Department of Psychiatry, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: dato@altgeorgia.ge.
Gvantsa Piralishvili
Zura Sikharulidze
George Kamkamidze
Sabrina Poole
George E Woody

Funding

Delaware Valley Node of the Clinical Trials NetworkU10DA013043 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WOODY, GEORGE EDWARD · 1999 to 2015
$25.8M
Treatment/Substance Use Disorders/HIV Risk ReductionK05DA017009 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WOODY, GEORGE EDWARD · 2003 to 2012
$1.3M
Suboxone and Methadone for HIV Risk Reduction in Subutex InjectorsR21DA026754 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WOODY, GEORGE EDWARD · 2009 to 2010
$347k
NIDA NIH HHS K05 DA017009NIDA NIH HHS KO5 DA-17009NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA026754NIDA NIH HHS R21-DA-026754NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA013043NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA-13043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsDetermine the extent to which buprenorphine injectors continue treatment with buprenorphine-naloxone or methadone, and the impact of these treatments on substance use and HIV risk in the Republic of Georgia.

methodsRandomized controlled 12-week trial of daily-observed methadone or buprenorphine-naloxone followed by a dose taper, referral to ongoing treatment, and follow-up at week 20 at the Uranti Clinic in Tbilisi, Republic of Georgia. Eighty consenting treatment-seeking individuals (40/group) aged 25 and above who met ICD-10 criteria for opioid dependence with physiologic features and reported injecting buprenorphine 10 or more times in the past 30 days. Opioid use according to urine tests and self-reports, treatment retention, and HIV risk behavior as determined by the Risk Assessment Battery.

resultsMean age of participants was 33.7 (SD5.7), 4 were female, mean history of opioid injection use was 5.8 years (SD4.6), none were HIV+ at intake or at the 12-week assessment and 73.4% were HCV+. Sixty-eight participants (85%) completed the 12-week medication phase (33 from methadone and 35 from buprenorphine/naloxone group); 37 (46%) were in treatment at the 20-week follow-up (21 from methadone and 16 from the buprenorphine/naloxone group). In both study arms, treatment resulted in a marked reduction in unprescribed buprenorphine, other opioid use, and HIV injecting risk behavior with no clinically significant differences between the two treatment arms.

conclusionsDaily observed methadone or buprenorphine-naloxone are effective treatments for non-medical buprenorphine and other opioid use in the Republic of Georgia and likely to be useful for preventing HIV infection.

Indexed as

Opiate Substitution TreatmentRisk-TakingAdultBuprenorphineFemaleGeorgia (Republic)Hepatitis CHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMethadoneNarcoticsNeedle SharingOpioid-Related DisordersSubstance Abuse DetectionSubstance Abuse, IntravenousBuprenorphineMethadoneNarcoticsBuprenorphine abuseRepublic of GeorgiaTreatment

Identifiers

PMID23916321
PMCPMC3818507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.