Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23916294›Full record

ArticleVaccine2013

Immunogenicity of single versus mixed allele vaccines of Plasmodium vivax Duffy binding protein region II.

Francis B Ntumngia, Jesse Schloegel, Amy M McHenry, Samantha J Barnes, Miriam T George, Sandra Kennedy, John H Adams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Inhibition of a malaria host-pathogen interaction by a computationally designed inhibitor.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  6. Progress towards the development of aExpert review of vaccines · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Broadly neutralizing epitopes in the Plasmodium vivax vaccine candidate Duffy Binding Protein.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francis B NtumngiaDepartment of Global Health, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, 3720 Spectrum Boulevard, Suite 304, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Jesse Schloegel
Amy M McHenry
Samantha J Barnes
Miriam T George
Sandra Kennedy
John H Adams
University of South Florida · US

Funding

Immunological characterization of the P. vivax DBPR01AI064478 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI ADAMS, JOHN H · 2006 to 2023
$9.6M
NIAID NIH HHS AI-N01-054210NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI064478NIAID NIH HHS R01AI064478
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Duffy binding protein (DBP) of Plasmodium vivax is vital for host erythrocyte invasion. DBP region II (DBPII) contains critical residues for receptor recognition and anti-DBPII antibodies have been shown to inhibit erythrocyte binding and invasion, thereby making the molecule an attractive vaccine candidate against P. vivax blood stages. Similar to other blood-stage antigens, allelic variation within the DBPII and associated strain-specific immunity is a major challenge for development of a broadly effective vaccine against P. vivax malaria. We hypothesized that immunization with a vaccine composed of multiple DBP alleles or a modified epitope DBP (DEKnull) will be more effective in producing a broadly reactive and inhibitory antibody response to diverse DBPII alleles than a single allele vaccine. In this study, we compared single, naturally occurring DBPII allele immunizations (Sal1, 7.18, P) and DEKnull with a combination of (Sal1, 7.18, P) alleles. Quantitative analysis by ELISA demonstrated that the multiple allele vaccine tend to be more immunogenic than any of the single allele vaccines when tested for reactivity against a panel of DBPII allelic variants whereas DEKnull was less immunogenic than the mixed-allele vaccine but similar in reactivity to the single allele vaccines. Further analysis for functional efficacy by in vitro erythrocyte-binding inhibition assays demonstrated that the multiple allele immunization produced a stronger strain-neutralizing response than the other vaccination strategies even though inhibition remained biased toward some alleles. Overall, there was no correlation between antibody titer and functional inhibition. These data suggest that a multiple allele vaccine may enhance immunogenicity of a DBPII vaccine but further investigation is required to optimize this vaccine strategy to achieve broader coverage against global P. vivax strains.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanAntibody FormationAntigens, ProtozoanCell LineChlorocebus aethiopsCOS CellsErythrocytesGenetic VariationHumansMalaria VaccinesMalaria, VivaxMiceMice, Inbred BALB CPlasmodium vivaxProtozoan ProteinsAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanDuffy antigen binding protein, PlasmodiumMalaria VaccinesProtozoan ProteinsReceptors, Cell SurfaceAMA1apical membrane antigen-1DARCDBPDBPIIDBP region IIDuffy antigen receptor for chemokinesDuffy binding protein (DBP)Malariamerozoite surface protein-1MSP1Multiple allelesPlasmodium vivaxrDBPIIrecombinant rDBPIIVaccines

Identifiers

PMID23916294
PMCPMC4497540
OpenAlexW2019537599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.