Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23915054›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cognitive neuroscience2013

The dissociation between early and late selection in older adults.

Brittany R Alperin, Anna E Haring, Tatyana Y Zhuravleva, Phillip J Holcomb, Dorene M Rentz, Kirk R Daffner

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brittany R AlperinHarvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Anna E Haring
Tatyana Y Zhuravleva
Phillip J Holcomb
Dorene M Rentz
Kirk R Daffner
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USTufts University · US

Funding

ERP Investigations of Novelty Processing in Different Patterns of Cognitive AgingR01AG017935 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI DAFFNER, KIRK R · 2002 to 2012
$4.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG017935PHS HHS R01 AGO17935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Older adults exhibit a reduced ability to ignore task-irrelevant stimuli; however, it remains to be determined where along the information processing stream the most salient age-associated changes occur. In the current study, ERPs provided an opportunity to determine whether age-related differences in processing task-irrelevant stimuli were uniform across information processing stages or disproportionately affected either early or late selection. ERPs were measured in young and old adults during a color-selective attention task in which participants responded to target letters in a specified color (attend condition) while ignoring letters in a different color (ignore condition). Old participants were matched to two groups of young participants on the basis of neuropsychological test performance: one using age-appropriate norms and the other using test scores not adjusted for age. There were no age-associated differences in the magnitude of early selection (attend-ignore), as indexed by the size of the anterior selection positivity and posterior selection negativity. During late selection, as indexed by P3b amplitude, both groups of young participants generated neural responses to target letters under the attend versus ignore conditions that were highly differentiated. In striking contrast, old participants generated a P3b to target letters with no reliable differences between conditions. Individuals who were slow to initiate early selection appeared to be less successful at executing late selection. Despite relative preservation of the operations of early selection, processing delays may lead older participants to allocate excessive resources to task-irrelevant stimuli during late selection.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingAttentionFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23915054
PMCPMC4642708
OpenAlexW1977432990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.