Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23914967›Full record

ReviewNanomedicine (London, England)2013

Computational nanomedicine: modeling of nanoparticle-mediated hyperthermal cancer therapy.

Chanchala D Kaddi, John H Phan, May D Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanomedicine (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Sex as an important factor in nanomedicine.Nature communications · 2021
    Review
  9. A mathematical model to predict nanomedicine pharmacokinetics and tumor delivery.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Hybrid Modeling of Ebola Propagation.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chanchala D KaddiWallace H Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
John H Phan
May D Wang

Funding

Tissue and Animal UseU54CA119338 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI SIMONS, JONATHAN W. · 2005 to 2009
$18.4M
Nanotechnology Linking Biomarkers with Cancer BehaviorR01CA108468 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI NIE, SHUMING · 2004 to 2008
$6.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA108468NCI NIH HHS R01CA108468NCI NIH HHS U54 CA119338NCI NIH HHS U54CA119338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanoparticle-mediated hyperthermia for cancer therapy is a growing area of cancer nanomedicine because of the potential for localized and targeted destruction of cancer cells. Localized hyperthermal effects are dependent on many factors, including nanoparticle size and shape, excitation wavelength and power, and tissue properties. Computational modeling is an important tool for investigating and optimizing these parameters. In this review, we focus on computational modeling of magnetic and gold nanoparticle-mediated hyperthermia, followed by a discussion of new opportunities and challenges.

Indexed as

NanomedicineDrug Delivery SystemsGoldHumansHyperthermia, InducedMagneticsMetal NanoparticlesNeoplasmsGold

Identifiers

PMID23914967
PMCPMC4983427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.