Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23914810›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2015

Ethical implications of home telecare for older people: a framework derived from a multisited participative study.

Maggie Mort, Celia Roberts, Jeannette Pols, Miquel Domenech, Ingunn Moser, EFORTT investigators

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions in prostate cancer survivorship: a scoping review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2023
    Article
  19. Trends in Telecare Use among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Maggie MortDepartment of Sociology and Division of Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Celia Roberts
Jeannette Pols
Miquel Domenech
Ingunn Moser
EFORTT investigators
Lancaster University · GBAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLDiakonhjemmet Hospital · NOUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextTelecare and telehealth developments have recently attracted much attention in research and service development contexts, where their evaluation has predominantly concerned effectiveness and efficiency. Their social and ethical implications, in contrast, have received little scrutiny.

objectiveTo develop an ethical framework for telecare systems based on analysis of observations of telecare-in-use and citizens' panel deliberations.

designEthnographic study (observation, work shadowing), interviews, older citizens' panels and a participative conference.

settingParticipants' homes, workplaces and familiar community venues in England, Spain, the Netherlands and Norway 2008-2011.

resultsOlder respondents expressed concerns that telecare might be used to replace face-to-face/hands-on care to cut costs. Citizens' panels strongly advocated ethical and social questions being considered in tandem with technical and policy developments. Older people are too often excluded from telecare system design, and installation is often wrongly seen as a one-off event. Some systems enhance self-care by increasing self-awareness, while others shift agency away from the older person, introducing new forms of dependency.

conclusionsTelecare has care limitations; it is not a solution, but a shift in networks of relations and responsibilities. Telecare cannot be meaningfully evaluated as an entity, but rather in the situated relations people and technologies create together. Characteristics of ethical telecare include on-going user/carer engagement in decision making about systems: in-home system evolution with feedback opportunities built into implementation. System design should be horizontal, 'two-way'/interactive rather than vertical or 'one-way'. An ethical framework for telecare has been developed from these conclusions (Table 1).

Indexed as

AgedHealth Services for the AgedHome Care ServicesHumansPatient ParticipationTelecommunicationsTelemedicineageingcitizens’ panelsethical frameworktechnologytelecare

Identifiers

PMID23914810
PMCPMC5060789
OpenAlexW2038600435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.