ArticleBMC microbiology2013
OmpR and RcsB abolish temporal and spatial changes in expression of flhD in Escherichia coli biofilm.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genomic diversification, adaptive convergence, and regulatory rewiring in aging Escherichia coli colonies.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Spatial regulation of cell motility and its fitness effect in a surface-attached bacterial community.The ISME journal · 2022Article
- CRISPR Interference (CRISPRi) Mediated Suppression of OmpR Gene in E. coli: An Alternative Approach to Inhibit Biofilm.Current microbiology · 2022Article
- The lipoprotein NlpD inVirulence · 2021Article
- Massively parallel transposon mutagenesis identifies temporally essential genes for biofilm formation inMicrobial genomics · 2021Article
- The CRISPR-Cas System Is Involved in OmpR Genetic Regulation for Outer Membrane Protein Synthesis inFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Reciprocal Regulation of OmpR and Hfq and Their Regulatory Actions on the Vi Polysaccharide Capsular Antigen in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhi.Current microbiology · 2018Article
- Phosphorylated OmpR Is Required for Type 3 Fimbriae Expression inFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- Involvement of Two-Component Signaling on Bacterial Motility and Biofilm Development.Journal of bacteriology · 2017Review
- Global Gene-expression Analysis of the Response ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
- Spontaneous mutations in the flhD operon generate motility heterogeneity in Escherichia coli biofilm.BMC microbiology · 2016Article
- Differential regulation of the hmsCDE operon in Yersinia pestis and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis by the Rcs phosphorelay system.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- A tale of two machines: a review of the BLAST meeting, Tucson, AZ, 20-24 January 2013.Molecular microbiology · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBiofilms are communities of bacteria that are characterized by specific phenotypes, including an increased resistance towards anti-microbials and the host immune system. This calls for the development of novel biofilm prevention and treatment options to combat infectious disease. In Escherichia coli, numerous global regulators have been implicated in the control of biofilm associated cell surface organelles. These include the flagellar regulator FlhD/FlhC, the osmoregulator EnvZ/OmpR, and the colanic acid activator RcsCDB. Using flow cell technology and fluorescence microscopy, we determined the temporal expression from flhD::gfp, ompR::gfp, and rcsB::gfp in E. coli biofilm, as well as the impact of the negative regulation of flhD by OmpR and RcsB. Spatial gene expression was investigated from flhD::gfp.
resultsThe temporal gene expression profile for flhD yielded an early peak at 12 h, a minimum of expression at 35 h, and a second increase in expression towards 51 h of biofilm development. In contrast, the ompR profile showed a peak at 35 h. A mutation in ompR abolished time dependence of flhD expression after the initial growth period of 12 h. Intriguingly, rcsB expression did not correlate inversely with flhD expression, yet a mutation in rcsB abolished time dependence of flhD expression as well. Spatially, expression of flhD was highest in the outermost layer of the biofilm in the parent strain. In ompR and rcsB mutants, flhD was expressed throughout the biofilm. Mutations in both, ompR and rcsB increased flhD expression throughout all temporal and spatial experiments. This increase was paralleled by reductions in biofilm amounts at four tested time points.
conclusionOur data lead to the conclusion that FlhD/FlhC and its regulation by OmpR and RcsB may be our first target mechanism for the development of novel biofilm prevention and treatment techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.