Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23914346›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in chemical engineering2013

Stem cell modeling: From gene networks to cell populations.

Jincheng Wu, Mahboubeh Rahmati Rostami, Emmanuel S Tzanakakis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in chemical engineering, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jincheng WuDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260.
Mahboubeh Rahmati Rostami
Emmanuel S Tzanakakis

Funding

Bioprocess for cardiac cell generation from human induced pluripotent stem cellsR01HL103709 · NHLBI · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI TZANAKAKIS, EMMANOUHL · 2011 to 2014
$1.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL103709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite rapid advances in the field of stem/progenitor cells through experimental studies, relevant modeling approaches have not progressed with a similar pace. Various models have focused on particular aspects of stem cell physiology including gene regulatory networks, gene expression noise and signaling cascades activated by exogenous factors. However, the self-renewal and differentiation of stem cells is driven by the coordinated regulation of events at the subcellular, intercellular and milieu levels. Such events also span multiple time domains from the fast molecular reactions governing gene expression to the slower cell cycle and division. Thus, the development of multiscale computational frameworks for stem cell populations is highly desirable. Multiscale models are expected to aid the design of efficient differentiation strategies and bioprocesses for the generation of therapeutically useful stem cell progeny. Yet, challenges in making these models tractable and pairing those to sufficient experimental data prevent their wide adoption by the stem cell community. Here, we review modeling approaches reported for stem cell populations and associated hurdles.

Indexed as

deterministic modeldifferentiationmultiscale modelpopulation balance modelself-renewalStem cellsstochastic model

Identifiers

PMID23914346
PMCPMC3727911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.