Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23914321›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2013

Neurocysticercosis: Five new things.

Arturo Carpio, Agnès Fleury, W Allen Hauser

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Present status of laboratory diagnosis of human taeniosis/cysticercosis in Europe.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Commentary.Journal of neurosciences in rural practice · 2014
    Article
  19. Commentary.Journal of neurosciences in rural practice · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arturo CarpioResearch Department (AC), University of Cuenca, Cuenca, Ecuador; G.H. Sergievsky Center (AC, WAH), Faculty of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY; and Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas (AF), UNAM Instituto Nacional de Neurologia y Neurocirugía, SS, Mexico City, Mexico.
Agnès Fleury
W Allen Hauser
University of Cuenca · EC

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurocysticercosis is the most common parasitic brain disease worldwide. Its clinical heterogeneity is related to localization, number and stage of evolution of the parasites, sex, age, and intensity of the host brain inflammatory reaction. In addition to the localization of the parasite, inflammation is the main phenomenon responsible of symptomatology. Acute symptomatic seizures are the most common symptom in patients with parenchymal parasites, but most do not evolve into epilepsy. Neurocysticercosis diagnosis is based mainly on neuroimaging. New imaging techniques have improved detection of the scolex and visualization of cysts in the extraparenchymal spaces. Immunologic testing can be useful, particularly when imaging is equivocal. Based on disappearance of parasites, antihelminthic drugs as currently used are effective in approximately one-third of patients with parenchymal viable cysts.

Identifiers

PMID23914321
PMCPMC3721239
OpenAlexW1995652999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.