ArticleIranian journal of parasitology2013
Bibliometric analysis of parasitological research in iran and Turkey: a comparative study.
Article in Iranian journal of parasitology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bibliometric Analysis of Veterinary Communication Education Research over the Last Two Decades: Rare Yet Essential.Veterinary sciences · 2022Article
- Growth of health literacy research activity in three Middle Eastern countries.BMJ health & care informatics · 2019Article
- Contribution of Arab countries to breast cancer research: comparison with non-Arab Middle Eastern countries.BMC women's health · 2015Article
- Substance use disorders in Arab countries: research activity and bibliometric analysis.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2014Article
- Assessing urology and nephrology research activity in Arab countries using ISI web of science bibliometric database.BMC research notes · 2014Article
- Osteoporosis is a neglected health priority in Arab World: a comparative bibliometric analysis.SpringerPlus · 2014Article
- Bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: research activity in Arab countries.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study was designed to assess and compare the quantity and quality of Iranian and Turkish researchers working in the field of Parasitology from bibliometric point of view.
methodsTo assess the contributions and achievements of the Iranian and Turkish parasitologists, bibliometric analysis was carried out based on the citation data retrieved from Web of Science.
resultsThe absolute productivity of Turkish and Iranian parasitologists' papers has almost tripled for Turkey, from 12 papers in 2002 to 36 papers in 2011, and decuple for Iran, from 10 papers to 123 from 2002 to 2010. The average number of citation per article is about 5.8 and 4 for Turkish and Iranian parasitologists' papers, respectively. The "Veterinary Parasitology" journal was the most cited journal in both countries. The majority (more than 90%) of cited items was foreign journal articles and one half of all references in journals articles dated 11 and 12 years while one half of cited books was dated within 14 to16 years for Turkish and Iranian papers, respectively.
conclusionBased on observed data and applied model, it is anticipated that the total number of Iranian and Turkish parasitologists' publications in Web of Science will exceed of 2512 and 240 articles per annum for Iranian and Turkish in 2020, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23914246PMC3724158What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.