Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23913953›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental botany2013

A force of nature: molecular mechanisms of mechanoperception in plants.

Gabriele B Monshausen, Elizabeth S Haswell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental botany, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Expression responses ofPlant signaling & behavior · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Evaluating Root Mechanosensing Response in Rice.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gabriele B MonshausenBiology Department, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Elizabeth S Haswell

Funding

Biophysical, Structural and Functional Analysis of Mechanosensitive ChannelsR01GM084211 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI HASWELL, ELIZABETH S, PHILLIPS, ROB · 2008 to 2016
$3.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084211NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084211-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to sense and respond to a wide variety of mechanical stimuli-gravity, touch, osmotic pressure, or the resistance of the cell wall-is a critical feature of every plant cell, whether or not it is specialized for mechanotransduction. Mechanoperceptive events are an essential part of plant life, required for normal growth and development at the cell, tissue, and whole-plant level and for the proper response to an array of biotic and abiotic stresses. One current challenge for plant mechanobiologists is to link these physiological responses to specific mechanoreceptors and signal transduction pathways. Here, we describe recent progress in the identification and characterization of two classes of putative mechanoreceptors, ion channels and receptor-like kinases. We also discuss how the secondary messenger Ca(2+) operates at the centre of many of these mechanical signal transduction pathways.

Indexed as

Plant Physiological PhenomenaSignal TransductionArabidopsisCalcium SignalingIon ChannelsMechanoreceptorsMechanotransduction, CellularModels, BiologicalPlant DevelopmentPlant ProteinsPlant RootsPlantsIon ChannelsPlant ProteinsCalciumcell-wall integritymechanoperceptionmechanosensitive ion channelsreceptor-like kinasesthigmomorphogenesis.

Identifiers

PMID23913953
PMCPMC3817949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.