Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23913479›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2014

Noise estimation from averaged diffusion weighted images: Can unbiased quantitative decay parameters assist cancer evaluation?

Nikolaos Dikaios, Shonit Punwani, Valentin Hamy, Pierpaolo Purpura, Scott Rice, Martin Forster, Ruheena Mendes, Stuart Taylor, David Atkinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Quantitative diffusion magnetic resonance imaging in head and neck tumors.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2018
    Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nikolaos DikaiosCentre for Medical Image Computing, Division Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London, UK; Centre for Medical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK.
Shonit Punwani
Valentin Hamy
Pierpaolo Purpura
Scott Rice
Martin Forster
Ruheena Mendes
Stuart Taylor
David Atkinson

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16463
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMultiexponential decay parameters are estimated from diffusion-weighted-imaging that generally have inherently low signal-to-noise ratio and non-normal noise distributions, especially at high b-values. Conventional nonlinear regression algorithms assume normally distributed noise, introducing bias into the calculated decay parameters and potentially affecting their ability to classify tumors. This study aims to accurately estimate noise of averaged diffusion-weighted-imaging, to correct the noise induced bias, and to assess the effect upon cancer classification.

methodsA new adaptation of the median-absolute-deviation technique in the wavelet-domain, using a closed form approximation of convolved probability-distribution-functions, is proposed to estimate noise. Nonlinear regression algorithms that account for the underlying noise (maximum probability) fit the biexponential/stretched exponential decay models to the diffusion-weighted signal. A logistic-regression model was built from the decay parameters to discriminate benign from metastatic neck lymph nodes in 40 patients.

resultsThe adapted median-absolute-deviation method accurately predicted the noise of simulated (R(2)  = 0.96) and neck diffusion-weighted-imaging (averaged once or four times). Maximum probability recovers the true apparent-diffusion-coefficient of the simulated data better than nonlinear regression (up to 40%), whereas no apparent differences were found for the other decay parameters.

conclusionsPerfusion-related parameters were best at cancer classification. Noise-corrected decay parameters did not significantly improve classification for the clinical data set though simulations show benefit for lower signal-to-noise ratio acquisitions.

Indexed as

Lymphatic MetastasisAdultAgedAlgorithmsCarcinoma, Squamous CellDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalSignal-To-Noise Ratiodiffusion weighted magnetic resonance imagingIVIMnoise estimation

Identifiers

PMID23913479
PMCPMC4282362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.