Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23913430›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2013

Coherence among different microbial source tracking markers in a small agricultural stream with or without livestock exclusion practices.

Graham Wilkes, Julie Brassard, Thomas A Edge, Victor Gannon, Cassandra C Jokinen, Tineke H Jones, Romain Marti, Norman F Neumann, Norma J Ruecker, Mark Sunohara and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The terrestrial and semi-aquatic invertebrates of intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Microbial Source Tracking in Adjacent Karst Springs.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Graham WilkesAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Julie Brassard
Thomas A Edge
Victor Gannon
Cassandra C Jokinen
Tineke H Jones
Romain Marti
Norman F Neumann
Norma J Ruecker
Mark Sunohara
Edward Topp
David R Lapen
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada · CAPublic Health Agency of Canada · CAEnvironment and Climate Change Canada · CAUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over 1,400 water samples were collected biweekly over 6 years from an intermittent stream protected and unprotected from pasturing cattle. The samples were monitored for host-specific Bacteroidales markers, Cryptosporidium species/genotypes, viruses and coliphages associated with humans or animals, and bacterial zoonotic pathogens. Ruminant Bacteroidales markers did not increase within the restricted cattle access reach of the stream, whereas the ruminant Bacteroidales marker increased significantly in the unrestricted cattle access reach. Human Bacteroidales markers significantly increased downstream of homes where septic issues were documented. Wildlife Bacteroidales markers were detected downstream of the cattle exclusion practice where stream and riparian habitat was protected, but detections decreased after the unrestricted pasture, where the stream and riparian zone was unprotected from livestock. Detection of a large number of human viruses was shown to increase downstream of homes, and similar trends were observed for the human Bacteroidales marker. There was considerable interplay among biomarkers with stream flow, season, and the cattle exclusion practices. There were no to very weak associations with Bacteroidales markers and bacterial, viral, and parasitic pathogens. Overall, discrete sample-by-sample coherence among the different microbial source tracking markers that expressed a similar microbial source was minimal, but spatial trends were physically meaningful in terms of land use (e.g., beneficial management practice) effects on sources of fecal pollution.

Indexed as

Water PollutionAnimalsBacteroidetesCattleCryptosporidiumHumansRiversViruses

Identifiers

PMID23913430
PMCPMC3811214
OpenAlexW2125222839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.