Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23913106›Full record

SynthesisJournal of community health2014

Qualitative systematic review of barber-administered health education, promotion, screening and outreach programs in African-American communities.

John S Luque, Levi Ross, Clement K Gwede

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of community health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03239665 (Randomized Trial of Peer-to-Peer Versus Pharmacist Education to Improve Older Adults' Vaccination Knowledge Through the Senior Center Model of Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 68 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03239665 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Trial of Peer-to-Peer Versus Pharmacist Education to Improve Older Adults' Vaccination Knowledge Through the Senior Center Model of Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorRutgers, The State University of New JerseyRan2017 to 2019Enrolled335ConditionsInfectious Disease, Pneumonia, Bacterial, Influenza, ZosterArmsPharmacist-led Intervention (PHARM), Peer-led Intervention (PEER)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Shop Talk: A Qualitative Study to Understand Peer Health-related Communication Among Black Men at the Barbershop.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Implementing barbershop-based health-promotion interventions for Black men: A systematic scoping review.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John S LuqueJiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, P.O. Box 8015, Statesboro, GA, 30460-8015, USA, jluque@georgiasouthern.edu.
Levi Ross
Clement K Gwede
Georgia Southern University · USMoffitt Cancer Center · US

Funding

Behavioral Oncology Education & Career DevelopmentR25CA090314 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR &RES INST · PI BRANDON, THOMAS H · 2003 to 2018
$4.0M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA090314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The barbershop has been portrayed as a culturally appropriate venue for reaching Black men with health information and preventive health screenings to overcome institutional and socio-cultural barriers. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the peer-reviewed literature on barbershop-based health programs to provide lessons learned for researchers and practitioners. A literature search was conducted to identify articles for the review. Inclusion criteria specified that studies had to be based in the United States and reported about research where barbers were either being assessed for the feasibility of their participation or recruited to administer health education/screening outreach or research activities. The literature search produced 901 unique bibliographic records from peer-reviewed publications. After eliminating articles not meeting the inclusion criteria, 35 articles remained for full-text review. The final article sample consisted of 16 articles for complete abstraction to assess characteristics of studies, role and training of barbers, outcomes targeted, effectiveness, and key findings. All barbershop-based studies reviewed targeted Black men in urban settings. Common study designs were cross-sectional studies, feasibility studies, needs assessments, and one-shot case studies. Barber administered interventions addressed primarily prostate cancer and hypertension, and barbers provided health education, screening, and referrals to health care. Nonintervention studies focused mostly on surveying or interviewing barbers for assessing the feasibility of future interventions. Barbershops are a culturally appropriate venue for disseminating health education materials in both print and media formats. Barbershops are also acceptable venues for training barbers to conduct education and screening. In studies where barbers received training, their knowledge of various health conditions increased significantly and knowledge gains were sustained over time. They were also able to increase knowledge and promote positive health behaviors among their customers, but these outcomes were variable and not consistently documented.

Indexed as

BarberingBlack or African AmericanHealth EducationHealth PromotionHumansMaleMass ScreeningReferral and ConsultationUnited States

Identifiers

PMID23913106
PMCPMC3947222
OpenAlexW2039861031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.