Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23913020›Full record

ArticleClinical neuroradiology2014

Endovascular treatment of isolated posterior inferior cerebellar artery dissecting aneurysms: parent artery occlusion or selective coiling?

F P Trivelato, M T Salles Rezende, G D Castro, L B Manzato, J F Santoro Araújo, A C Ulhôa

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Isolated ruptured dissecting aneurysm of PICA with extremely narrow neck managed by a novel endovascular technique-a case report and review of literature.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ten years of experience in endovascular treatment of ruptured aneurysms of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2016
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

F P TrivelatoNeurovascular Institute, Hospital das Clínicas of Federal University of Minas Gerais, Felício Rocho Hospital and Mater Dei Hospital, Rua Timbiras 3616, Barro Preto, 30140-062, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, felipepadovani@yahoo.com.br.
M T Salles Rezende
G D Castro
L B Manzato
J F Santoro Araújo
A C Ulhôa
Hospital Felício Rocho · BRMater Dei Hospital · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIsolated posterior inferior cerebellar artery dissecting aneurysms are rare lesions. Their underlying pathology, presentation, and natural history are poorly understood. Their treatment is controversial, and few data are available regarding the best treatment. We conducted the first study comparing selective coiling and parent artery occlusion for the treatment of isolated PICA dissecting aneurysms.

methodsAll patients harboring isolated PICA dissecting aneurysms treated between January 2006 and October 2012, in a single center, were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were consecutively submitted either to selective coiling or parent artery occlusion. The safety and durability (recanalization and rebleeding rates) of each treatment were established. In order to compare the results of both treatment modalities, we also performed a literature search of all cases of isolated PICA dissecting aneurysms endovascularly treated.

resultsFourteen patients harboring isolated PICA dissecting aneurysms were assigned to endovascular treatment in our center (eight to selective coiling vs six to parent artery occlusion). There was no statistical difference between both groups regarding complications. No patient experienced rebleeding. One recanalization was observed in the selective coiling group. Based on literature review (83 cases), selective coiling and parent artery occlusion showed similar success rate in preventing rebleeding. Parent artery occlusion was significantly associated with a higher risk of ischemic complication (p = 0.013).

conclusionsBoth selective coiling and parent artery occlusion are highly effective in preventing rebleeding in isolated PICA dissecting aneurysms. Although total complication rate is similar between both modalities, parent artery occlusion is significantly associated to a higher risk of ischemic events.

Indexed as

StentsAdultAgedAortic DissectionArteriesBlood Vessel ProsthesisCerebellumCerebral Arterial DiseasesEndovascular ProceduresHumansIntracranial AneurysmLateral Medullary SyndromeMiddle AgedRadiographyTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23913020
OpenAlexW2007429904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.