Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23912674›Full record

SynthesisDrugs & aging2013

Patient barriers to and enablers of deprescribing: a systematic review.

Emily Reeve, Josephine To, Ivanka Hendrix, Sepehr Shakib, Michael S Roberts, Michael D Wiese

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drugs & aging, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 282 papers, 23 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
282citing papers in PubMed, 23 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02558049 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Should I Continue Taking My Acid Reflux Medication? Development and Pilot Testing of a Patient Decision Aid

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OttawaRan2015 to 2016Enrolled12ConditionsProton Pump Inhibitors, Gastroesophageal Reflux DiseaseArmsDecision aid
NCT03283735 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Deprescribing: a Portrait and Out-comes of the Reduction of Polypharmacy in Portugal

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Beira InteriorRan2019 to 2020Enrolled380ConditionsPolypharmacy, DeprescriptionsArmsElderly Enablement
NCT03689049 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

SPIDER: A Structured Process Informed by Data, Evidence and Research - A Research and Quality Improvement Collaboration Supporting Practices in Improving Care for Complex Elderly Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Toronto Practice Based Research NetworkRan2018 to 2027Enrolled104ConditionsPolypharmacy, Inappropriate Prescribing, Aged, Primary Health CareArmsSPIDER, Usual Care
NCT06212713 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Development and Validation of a Health Behaviour Theory-based Questionnaire to Explore the Willingness of Older Adults and Informal Caregivers to Deprescribe

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversité Catholique de LouvainRan2023 to 2024Enrolled600ConditionsPsychologicalArmsQuestionnaire administration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

282 citing papers in PubMed, 23 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Screening for potentially inappropriate prescribing in primary care: Canadian guideline.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2026
    Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Consumer Attitudes Towards Deprescribing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

222 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emily ReeveSansom Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia, emily.reeve@mymail.unisa.edu.au.
Josephine To
Ivanka Hendrix
Sepehr Shakib
Michael S Roberts
Michael D Wiese

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInappropriate medication use is common in the elderly and the risks associated with their use are well known. The term deprescribing has been utilised to describe the complex process that is required for the safe and effective cessation of inappropriate medications. Given the primacy of the consumer in health care, their views must be central in the development of any deprescribing process.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to identify barriers and enablers that may influence a patient's decision to cease a medication. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search of MEDLINE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, EMBASE, CINAHL, Informit and Scopus was conducted and augmented with a manual search. Numerous search terms relating to withdrawal of medications and consumers' beliefs were utilised. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Articles were included if the barriers or enablers were directly patient/carer reported and related to long-term medication(s) that they were currently taking or had recently ceased. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS

methodsDetermination of relevance and data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers. Content analysis with coding was utilised for synthesis of results.

resultsTwenty-one articles met the criteria and were included in the review. Three themes, disagreement/agreement with 'appropriateness' of cessation, absence/presence of a 'process' for cessation, and negative/positive 'influences' to cease medication, were identified as both potential barriers and enablers, with 'fear' of cessation and 'dislike' of medications as a fourth barrier and enabler, respectively. The most common barrier/enabler identified was 'appropriateness' of cessation, with 15 studies identifying this as a barrier and 18 as an enabler. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY

findingsThe decision to stop a medication by an individual is influenced by multiple competing barriers and enablers. Knowledge of these will aid in the development of a deprescribing process, particularly in approaching the topic of cessation with the patient and what process should be utilised. However, further research is required to determine if the proposed patient-centred deprescribing process will result in improved patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Decision MakingHumansInappropriate PrescribingPatient SafetyWithholding Treatment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.