Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23912600›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2013

DNA vaccines: a simple DNA sensing matter?

Cevayir Coban, Kouji Kobiyama, Nao Jounai, Miyuki Tozuka, Ken J Ishii

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. In vitro and in vivo correlation of skin and cellular responses to nucleic acid delivery.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. DNA Vaccines-How Far From Clinical Use?International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Novel antigen delivery systems.World journal of virology · 2015
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Cevayir CobanLaboratory of Malaria Immunology; WPI Immunology Frontier Research Center (IFReC); Osaka University; Osaka, Japan.
Kouji KobiyamaLaboratory of Adjuvant Innovation; National Institute of Biomedical Innovation; Osaka, Japan; Laboratory of Vaccine Science; IFReC; Osaka University; Osaka, Japan.
Nao JounaiLaboratory of Adjuvant Innovation; National Institute of Biomedical Innovation; Osaka, Japan.
Miyuki TozukaLaboratory of Adjuvant Innovation; National Institute of Biomedical Innovation; Osaka, Japan.
Ken J IshiiLaboratory of Adjuvant Innovation; National Institute of Biomedical Innovation; Osaka, Japan; Laboratory of Vaccine Science; IFReC; Osaka University; Osaka, Japan.
National Institute of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition · JPInstitut de Recherche Vaccinale · FROsaka International University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the introduction of DNA vaccines two decades ago, this attractive strategy has been hampered by its low immunogenicity in humans. Studies conducted to improve the immunogenicity of DNA vaccines have shown that understanding the mechanism of action of DNA vaccines might be the key to successfully improving their immunogenicity. Our current understanding is that DNA vaccines induce innate and adaptive immune responses in two ways: (1) encoded protein (or polypeptide) antigen(s) by the DNA plasmid can be expressed in stromal cells (i.e., muscle cells) as well as DCs, where these antigens are processed and presented to naïve CD4 or CD8 T cells either by direct or cross presentation, respectively; and (2) the transfected DNA plasmid itself may bind to an un-identified cytosolic DNA sensor and activate the TBK1-STING pathway and the production of type I interferons (IFNs) which function as an adjuvant. Recent studies investigating double-stranded cytosolic DNA sensor(s) have highlighted new mechanisms in which cytosolic DNA may release secondary metabolites, which are in turn recognized by a novel DNA sensing machinery. Here, we discuss these new metabolites and the possibilities of translating this knowledge into improved immunogenicity for DNA vaccines.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityAdjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsDNAHumansImmunity, InnateRecombinant ProteinsVaccines, DNAAdjuvants, ImmunologicDNARecombinant ProteinsVaccines, DNAadjuvantDNA vaccineSTINGTBK1type I interferon

Identifiers

PMID23912600
PMCPMC3906407
OpenAlexW2042523084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.