Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23912506›Full record

Trial reportInternational urogynecology journal2014

Surgical preparation: are patients "ready" for stress urinary incontinence surgery?

L Brubaker, H J Litman, L Rickey, K Y Dyer, A D Markland, L Sirls, P Norton, E Casiano, M F R Paraiso, C Ghetti and 2 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International urogynecology journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03198481 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Protocol for Patient-Centered Versus Physician-Centered Counseling Video for Midurethral Slings an RCT

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of New MexicoRan2017 to 2019Enrolled70ConditionsStress Urinary Incontinence, SatisfactionArmsPatient-Centered Counseling Video, Physician Counseling Video
NCT05086406 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Virtual and Video Counseling Versus In-Office Counseling for Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Cleveland ClinicRan2021 to 2025Enrolled128ConditionsPatient EngagementArmsCombination of Video and Virtual Pre-operative Counseling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

L BrubakerDepartments of OG and Urology, Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, 2160 South First Avenue, Maywood, Chicago, IL, 60153, USA, Lbrubaker@lumc.edu.
H J Litman
L Rickey
K Y Dyer
A D Markland
L Sirls
P Norton
E Casiano
M F R Paraiso
C Ghetti
D D Rahn
J W Kusek
Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak · USCleveland Clinic · USKaiser Permanente · USLoyola University Chicago · USNational Institutes of Health · USNew England Research Institutes · USThe University of Texas at San Antonio · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network: DCCU01DK058229 · NIDDK · NEW ENGLAND RESEARCH INSTITUTES, INC. · PI TENNSTEDT, SHARON L · 2000 to 2012
$16.1M
UAB Continence Treatment Center U01DK060380 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI RICHTER, HOLLY E · 2001 to 2009
$3.9M
Urinary Incontinence Treatment NetworkU01DK058225 · NIDDK · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI ZYCZYNSKI, HALINA M · 2000 to 2009
$3.8M
UCSD INCONTINENCE TREATMENT CENTERU01DK060401 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ALBO, MICHAEL · 2001 to 2010
$3.6M
Continuation of the Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network (UITN)U01DK060379 · NIDDK · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI BRUBAKER, LINDA · 2001 to 2009
$3.6M
UTAH URINARY INCONTINENCE TREATMENT NETWORK (UUITN)U01DK060393 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI NORTON, PEGGY A · 2001 to 2009
$3.4M
Urinary Incontinence Treatment NetworkU01DK058231 · NIDDK · WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL RESEARCH INST · PI SIRLS, LARRY T · 2000 to 2009
$3.3M
Pelvic Floor Disorders Network 2021UG1HD054241 · NICHD · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI David Dwight Rahn · 2016 to 2026
$3.0M
Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network (UITN)U01DK060397 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI CHAI, TOBY C · 2001 to 2010
$2.7M
Urinary Incontinence Treatment NetworkU01DK060395 · NIDDK · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZIMMERN, PHILIPPE E · 2001 to 2009
$2.4M
The Urinary Incontinence Treatment NetworkU01DK058234 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI KRAUS, STEPHEN R · 2000 to 2009
$2.3M
NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD054241NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK058225NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK058229NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK058231NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK058234NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060379NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060380NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060393NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060395NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060397NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060401NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK58225NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK58229NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK58231NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK58234NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK60379NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK60380NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK60393NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK60395NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK60397NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK60401NIMHD NIH HHS L60 MD000931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisPatient preparedness for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery is associated with improvements in post-operative satisfaction, symptoms and quality of life (QoL). This planned secondary analysis examined the association of patient preparedness with surgical outcomes, treatment satisfaction and quality of life.

methodsThe ValUE trial compared the effect of pre-operative urodynamic studies with a standardized office evaluation of outcomes of SUI surgery at 1 year. In addition to primary and secondary outcome measures, patient satisfaction with treatment was measured using a five-point Likert scale (very dissatisfied to very satisfied) that queried subjects to rate the treatment's effect on overall incontinence, urge incontinence, SUI, and frequency. Preparedness for surgery was assessed using an 11-question Patient Preparedness Questionnaire (PPQ).

resultsBased on PPQ question 11, 4 out of 5 (81 %) of women reported they "agreed" or "strongly agreed" that they were prepared for surgery. Selected demographic and clinical characteristics were similar in unprepared and prepared women. Among SUI severity baseline measures, total UDI score was significantly but weakly associated with preparedness (question 11 of the PPQ; Spearman's r = 0.13, p = 0.001). Although preparedness for surgery was not associated with successful outcomes, it was associated with satisfaction (r s = 0.11, p = 0.02) and larger PGI-S improvement (increase; p = 0.008).

conclusionsApproximately half (48 %) of women "strongly agreed" that they felt prepared for SUI. Women with higher pre-operative preparedness scores were more satisfied, although surgical outcomes did not differ.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPreoperative CareQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeUrinary Incontinence, Stress

Identifiers

PMID23912506
PMCPMC3833875
OpenAlexW1993274449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.