Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23911349›Full record

ArticleBiochimica et biophysica acta2013

Suppression of Aβ toxicity by puromycin-sensitive aminopeptidase is independent of its proteolytic activity.

Antonina J Kruppa, Stanislav Ott, Dhia S Chandraratna, James A Irving, Richard M Page, Elena Speretta, Tiffany Seto, Luiz Miguel Camargo, Stefan J Marciniak, David A Lomas and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochimica et biophysica acta, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Exploring Aβ Proteotoxicity and Therapeutic Candidates UsingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. UsingBioMed research international · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Antonina J KruppaCambridge Institute for Medical Research, Wellcome Trust/MRC Building, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XY, UK; Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Box 157, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK; Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EH, UK.
Stanislav Ott
Dhia S Chandraratna
James A Irving
Richard M Page
Elena Speretta
Tiffany Seto
Luiz Miguel Camargo
Stefan J Marciniak
David A Lomas
Damian C Crowther
University of Cambridge · GBWellcome Trust · GBMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USAddenbrooke's Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0601840Medical Research Council G0700990Medical Research Council G0901786Medical Research Council G1002610Wellcome Trust 082604/2/07/ZWellcome Trust 089703Wellcome Trust 100140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accumulation of β-amyloid (Aβ) peptide in the brain is one of the pathological hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease and is thought to be of primary aetiological significance. In an unbiased genetic screen, we identified puromycin-sensitive aminopeptidase (PSA) as a potent suppressor of Aβ toxicity in a Drosophila model system. We established that coexpression of Drosophila PSA (dPSA) in the flies' brains improved their lifespan, protected against locomotor deficits, and reduced brain Aβ levels by clearing the Aβ plaque-like deposits. However, confocal microscopy and subcellular fractionation of amyloid-expressing 7PA2 cells demonstrated that PSA localizes to the cytoplasm. Therefore, PSA and Aβ are unlikely to be in the same cellular compartment; moreover, when we artificially placed them in the same compartment in flies, we could not detect a direct epistatic interaction. The consequent hypothesis that PSA's suppression of Aβ toxicity is indirect was supported by the finding that Aβ is not a proteolytic substrate for PSA in vitro. Furthermore, we showed that the enzymatic activity of PSA is not required for rescuing Aβ toxicity in neuronal SH-SY5Y cells. We investigated whether the stimulation of autophagy by PSA was responsible for these protective effects. However PSA's promotion of autophagosome fusion with lysosomes required proteolytic activity and so its effect on autophagy is not identical to its protection against Aβ toxicity.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAminopeptidasesAmyloid beta-PeptidesAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedAutophagyBlotting, WesternBrainDrosophila melanogasterEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFlow CytometryFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesNeuroblastomaNeuronsAminopeptidasesAmyloid beta-Peptidesenkephalin degrading enzymePuromycinRNA, MessengerAlzheimerAmyloidAutophagyProteolysisPuromycin-sensitive aminopeptidase

Identifiers

PMID23911349
PMCPMC3898073
OpenAlexW2151009423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.