ReviewJournal of diabetes science and technology2013
A review of user-centered design for diabetes-related consumer health informatics technologies.
Review in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Web-Based Interventions for Dietary Behavior in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Pooled it
- Spanish-Language Consumer Health Information Technology Interventions: A Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2016Pooled it
- Experiences With Integrating Medical Terminologies Into User Interfaces for a Decision Support System for Primary Care: Conceptual and Development Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Exploring Psychosocial Burdens of Diabetes in Pregnancy and the Feasibility of Technology-Based Support: Qualitative Study.JMIR diabetes · 2025Article
- Anticipations and Requirements of Individuals with Long-Term Health Conditions Regarding Self-Management and Digital Health Support Tools.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Evaluating and improving the usability of a mHealth platform to assess postoperative dental pain.JAMIA open · 2024Article
- Requirements analysis for an AI-based clinical decision support system for general practitioners: a user-centered design process.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Adapting user-centered design principles to improve communication of peer parent narratives on pediatric tracheostomy.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Applying user-centered design in the development of nudges for a pragmatic trial to reduce no-shows among veterans.Patient education and counseling · 2022Article
- User-centered development of a digitally-delivered dietary intervention for adults with type 2 diabetes: The T2Diet study.Internet interventions · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- A Mobile Health App (WYZ) for Engagement in Care and Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence Among Youth and Young Adults Living With HIV: Single-Arm Pilot Intervention Study.JMIR formative research · 2021Article
- Smart about medications (SAM): a digital solution to enhance medication management following hospital discharge.JAMIA open · 2021Article
- User-Centered Design Process of an mHealth App for Health Professionals: Case Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2021Article
- Evaluation of a clinical decision support system for rare diseases: a qualitative study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- Diagnosis of Rare Diseases: a scoping review of clinical decision support systems.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2020Article
- Effect of Prior Health Knowledge on the Usability of Two Home Medical Devices: Usability Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Article
- Interviews with experts in rare diseases for the development of clinical decision support system software - a qualitative study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020Article
- Designing an Information and Communications Technology Tool With and for Victims of Violence and Their Case Managers in San Francisco: Human-Centered Design Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
User-centered design (UCD) is well recognized as an effective human factor engineering strategy for designing ease of use in the total customer experience with products and information technology that has been applied specifically to health care information technology systems. We conducted a literature review to analyze the current research regarding the use of UCD methods and principles to support the development or evaluation of diabetes-related consumer health informatics technology (CHIT) initiatives. Findings indicate that (1) UCD activities have been applied across the technology development life cycle stages, (2) there are benefits to incorporating UCD to better inform CHIT development in this area, and (3) the degree of adoption of the UCD process is quite uneven across diabetes CHIT studies. In addition, few to no studies report on methods used across all phases of the life cycle with process detail. To address that void, the Appendix provides an illustrative case study example of UCD techniques across development stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.