Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23911187›Full record

ReviewJournal of diabetes science and technology2013

Common causes of glucose oxidase instability in in vivo biosensing: a brief review.

James M Harris, Catherine Reyes, Gabriel P Lopez

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Glucose Fuel Cells: Electricity From Blood Sugar.IEEE reviews in biomedical engineering · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Continuous Glucose Monitoring Enabled by Fluorescent Nanodiamond Boronic Hydrogel.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James M HarrisDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Research Triangle Materials Research Science and Engineering Center, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA. james.m.harris@duke.edu
Catherine Reyes
Gabriel P Lopez
Triangle · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical management of diabetes must overcome the challenge of in vivo glucose sensors exhibiting lifetimes of only a few days. Limited sensor life originates from compromised enzyme stability of the sensing enzyme. Sensing enzymes degrade in the presence of low molecular weight materials (LMWM) and hydrogen peroxide in vivo. Sensing enzymes could be made to withstand these degradative effects by (1) stabilizing the microenvironment surrounding the sensing enzyme or (2) improving the structural stability of the sensing enzyme genetically. We review the degradative effect of LMWM and hydrogen peroxide on the sensing enzyme glucose oxidase (GOx). In addition, we examine advances in stabilizing GOx against degradation using hybrid silica gels and genetic engineering of GOx. We conclude molecularly engineered GOx combined with silica-based encapsulation provides an avenue for designing long-term in vivo sensor systems.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesCross-Linking ReagentsDrug CompoundingDrug StabilityEnzymes, ImmobilizedEnzyme StabilityGlucose OxidaseGlutaralHumansCross-Linking ReagentsEnzymes, ImmobilizedGlucose OxidaseGlutaral

Identifiers

PMID23911187
PMCPMC3879770
OpenAlexW2238282564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.