Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23908119›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical investigation2013

Recent molecular discoveries in angiogenesis and antiangiogenic therapies in cancer.

Jonathan Welti, Sonja Loges, Stefanie Dimmeler, Peter Carmeliet

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 285 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
285citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

285 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Bioprinted research models of urological malignancy.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2024
    Review
  20. Article

225 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonathan WeltiVesalius Research Center, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Sonja Loges
Stefanie Dimmeler
Peter Carmeliet

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Four decades ago, angiogenesis was recognized as a therapeutic target for blocking cancer growth. Because of its importance, VEGF has been at the center stage of antiangiogenic therapy. Now, several years after FDA approval of an anti-VEGF antibody as the first antiangiogenic agent, many patients with cancer and ocular neovascularization have benefited from VEGF-targeted therapy; however, this anticancer strategy is challenged by insufficient efficacy, intrinsic refractoriness, and resistance. Here, we examine recent discoveries of new mechanisms underlying angiogenesis, discuss successes and challenges of current antiangiogenic therapy, and highlight emerging antiangiogenic paradigms.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsAngiogenic ProteinsAnimalsCell ProliferationChemotaxisEndothelial CellsHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsNeovascularization, PathologicVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-3Angiogenesis InhibitorsAngiogenic ProteinsFLT4 protein, humanVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-3

Identifiers

PMID23908119
PMCPMC3726176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.