Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23907700›Full record

Trial reportHepatology (Baltimore, Md.)2013

Once-daily simeprevir (TMC435) with pegylated interferon and ribavirin in treatment-naïve genotype 1 hepatitis C: the randomized PILLAR study.

Michael W Fried, Maria Buti, Gregory J Dore, Robert Flisiak, Peter Ferenci, Ira Jacobson, Patrick Marcellin, Michael Manns, Igor Nikitin, Fred Poordad and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 122 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
122citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
31.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

122 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 270 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Direct-acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Direct-acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Recommendations on hepatitis C screening for adults.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2017
    Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Article

62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 14 institutions in 11 countries.

Michael W FriedUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC.
Maria Buti
Gregory J Dore
Robert Flisiak
Peter Ferenci
Ira Jacobson
Patrick Marcellin
Michael Manns
Igor Nikitin
Fred Poordad
Morris Sherman
Stefan Zeuzem
Jane Scott
Leen Gilles
Oliver Lenz
Monika Peeters
Vanitha Sekar
Goedele De Smedt
Maria Beumont-Mauviel
Janssen (Belgium) · BECornell University · USGoethe University Frankfurt · DEHôpital Beaujon · FRJanssen (United Kingdom) · GBJanssen (United States) · USMedical University of Białystok · PLMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEPirogov Russian National Research Medical University · RUSt Vincent's Hospital Sydney · AUThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USToronto General Hospital · CAUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USVienna General Hospital · AT

Funding

Mentoring Junior Faculty: Viral hepatitis Clinical ResearchK24DK066144 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FRIED, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2014
$1.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK066144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThe phase IIb, double-blind, placebo-controlled PILLAR trial investigated the efficacy and safety of two different simeprevir (SMV) doses administered once-daily (QD) with pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN)-α-2a and ribavirin (RBV) in treatment-naïve patients with HCV genotype 1 infection. Patients were randomized to one of five treatments: SMV (75 or 150 mg QD) for 12 or 24 weeks or placebo, plus Peg-IFN and RBV. Patients in the SMV arms stopped all treatment at week 24 if response-guided therapy (RGT) criteria were met; patients not meeting RGT continued with Peg-IFN and RBV until week 48, as did patients in the placebo control group. Sustained virologic response (SVR) rates measured 24 weeks after the planned end of treatment (SVR24) were 74.7%-86.1% in the SMV groups versus 64.9% in the control group (P < 0.05 for all comparisons [SMV versus placebo], except SMV 75 mg for 24 weeks). Rapid virologic response (HCV RNA <25 IU/mL undetectable at week 4) was achieved by 68.0%-75.6% of SMV-treated and 5.2% of placebo control patients. According to RGT criteria, 79.2%-86.1% of SMV-treated patients completed treatment by week 24; 85.2%-95.6% of these subsequently achieved SVR24. The adverse event profile was generally similar across the SMV and placebo control groups, with the exception of mild reversible hyperbilirubinemia, without serum aminotransferase abnormalities, associated with higher doses of SMV.

conclusionSMV QD in combination with Peg-IFN and RBV significantly improves SVR rates, compared with Peg-IFN and RBV alone, and allows the majority of patients to shorten their therapy duration to 24 weeks.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHepacivirusHepatitis C, ChronicHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingHumansInterferon-alphaMaleMiddle AgedPolyethylene GlycolsRecombinant ProteinsRibavirinRNA, ViralSimeprevirHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingInterferon-alphapeginterferon alfa-2aPolyethylene GlycolsRecombinant ProteinsRibavirinRNA, ViralSimeprevirSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID23907700
PMCPMC4112500
OpenAlexW1983765304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.