ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2013
"OSMO-UT-DSAEK" using THIN-C medium.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current concepts and recent trends in endothelial keratoplasty.World journal of transplantation · 2025Review
- Nomogram for single-pass automated microkeratome graft preparation for ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.International ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Commentary: Ultrathin Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2019Article
- Deformation velocity imaging using optical coherence tomography and its applications to the cornea.Biomedical optics express · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhen performing ultra-thin Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK), the quality of the stromal interface and stromal thickness seem to be critical for visual outcome. The aim of this study was to investigate whether additional osmotic deswelling prior to UT-DSAEK improves the quality of the cut surface and leads to a more reliable and deeper cut in UT-DSAEK ("OSMO-UT-DSAEK").
methodsSeventeen human donor corneas not usable for transplantation were used in this experiment. After standard deswelling with culture Medium II, ten corneas were randomly assigned to be additionally deswollen within THIN-C medium. The other remaining seven corneas were put back into culture Medium II. All corneas were placed in an artificial anterior chamber system (Moria); a double path cutting procedure using a microkeratome (Moria) was then performed. Corneal thickness was measured by ultrasound biomicroscopy and in paraffin-embedded slides, followed by histological grading of the cut surface.
resultsStromal interface smoothness significantly improved after preconditioning in THIN-C medium (Pearson P = 0.019). The correlation of the corneal thickness obtained by UBM (mean 706 ± SD 208 μm) and histology (mean 530 ± SD 159 μm) was not significant (Pearson r = 0.11, P > 0.05, mean difference 247, 95 % CI [+50;+304]). We found no significant correlation between the microkeratome setting and the actual thickness of the lenticule measured in histological analysis in both media as well as for the first and second cut (first cut: Pearson r = 0.9, P = 0.1, 95 % CI [-10;+96], second cut: Pearson r = 0.9, P = 0.4, 95 % CI [-10;+22]).
conclusionPreconditioning of corneas with THIN-C medium significantly improved the quality of the graft interface in UT-DSAEK, but did not significantly improve the cut precision of the microkeratome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23907483What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.