Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23907285›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

A method for controlling complex confounding effects in the detection of adverse drug reactions using electronic health records.

Ying Li, Hojjat Salmasian, Santiago Vilar, Herbert Chase, Carol Friedman, Ying Wei

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Developing a Data-driven Medication Indication Knowledge Base using a Large Scale Medical Claims Database.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2019
    Article
  13. A Hybrid Normalization Method for Medical Concepts in Clinical Narrative using Semantic Matching.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. -Omic and Electronic Health Record Big Data Analytics for Precision Medicine.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2017
    Review
  20. Literature-Based Discovery of Confounding in Observational Clinical Data.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ying LiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Hojjat Salmasian
Santiago Vilar
Herbert Chase
Carol Friedman
Ying Wei

Funding

Training in Biomedical Informatics at Columbia UniversityT15LM007079 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI NOEMIE ELHADAD, GEORGE M HRIPCSAK · 1992 to 2026
$28.9M
DISCOVERING AND APPLYING KNOWLEDGE IN CLINICAL DATABASESR01LM006910 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HRIPCSAK, GEORGE M · 2000 to 2023
$10.6M
Pharmacovigilence using Natural Language Processing, Statistics, and the EHRR01LM010016 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI FRIEDMAN, CAROL · 2009 to 2016
$3.4M
A Biomedical Natural Language Processing ResourceR01LM008635 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI FRIEDMAN, CAROL · 2005 to 2008
$2.1M
NLM NIH HHS 5T15-LM007079NLM NIH HHS R01 LM006910NLM NIH HHS R01 LM008635NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010016NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010016-0S1NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010016-0S2NLM NIH HHS R01 LM06910NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveElectronic health records (EHRs) contain information to detect adverse drug reactions (ADRs), as they contain comprehensive clinical information. A major challenge of using comprehensive information involves confounding. We propose a novel data-driven method to identify ADR signals accurately by adjusting for confounders. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe focused on two serious ADRs, rhabdomyolysis and pancreatitis, and used information in 264,155 unique patient records. We identified an ADR using established criteria, selected potential confounders, and then used penalized logistic regressions to estimate confounder-adjusted ADR associations. A reference standard was created to evaluate and compare the precision of the proposed method and four others.

resultsPrecision was 83.3% for rhabdomyolysis and 60.8% for pancreatitis when using the proposed method, and we identified several drug safety signals that are interesting for further clinical review. DISCUSSION: The proposed method effectively estimated ADR associations after adjusting for confounders. A main cause of error was probably due to the nature of the dataset in that a substantial number of patients had a single visit only and, therefore, it was not possible to determine correctly the appropriate sequence of events for them. It is likely that performance will be improved with use of EHR data that contain more longitudinal records.

conclusionsThis data-driven method is effective in controlling for confounding, resulting in either a higher or similar precision when compared with four comparators, has the unique ability to provide insight into confounders for each specific medication-ADR pair, and can be easily adapted to other EHR systems.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsAdultAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAgedConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansKnowledge BasesMaleMiddle AgedPancreatitisRhabdomyolysis

Identifiers

PMID23907285
PMCPMC3932454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.