Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23907142›Full record

SynthesisEuropean heart journal2013

Adherence to cardiovascular therapy: a meta-analysis of prevalence and clinical consequences.

Rajiv Chowdhury, Hassan Khan, Emma Heydon, Amir Shroufi, Saman Fahimi, Carmel Moore, Bruno Stricker, Shanthi Mendis, Albert Hofman, Jonathan Mant and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European heart journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04616612 (Medication Adherence Given Individual SystemCHANGE), which is not on this map. Cited by 386 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
386citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04616612 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Medication Adherence Given Individual SystemCHANGE(TM) in Advancing Nephropathy (MAGICIAN) Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndiana UniversityRan2021 to 2024Enrolled150ConditionsChronic Kidney Disease(CKD)ArmsSystemCHANGE (TM), Attention Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

386 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Adherence to Chronic Therapies: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Fluctuations in adherence to antihypertensive medication and cardiovascular outcomes: a secondary analysis of the SPRINT trial.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Review

326 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Commented on by
    2021
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rajiv ChowdhuryDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK.
Hassan Khan
Emma Heydon
Amir Shroufi
Saman Fahimi
Carmel Moore
Bruno Stricker
Shanthi Mendis
Albert Hofman
Jonathan Mant
Oscar H Franco

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/08/014/24067Medical Research Council MR/L003120/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe aim of this study was to determine the extent to which adherence to individual vascular medications, assessed by different methods, influences the absolute and relative risks (RRs) of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality. METHODS AND

resultsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies (cohort, nested case-control, or clinical trial) identified through electronic searches using MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases, involving adult populations (≥ 18 years old) and reporting risk estimates of cardiovascular medication adherence with any CVD (defined as any fatal or non-fatal coronary heart disease, stroke or sudden cardiac death) and/or all-cause mortality (defined as mortality from any cause) outcomes. Relative risks were combined using random-effects models. Forty-four unique prospective studies comprising 1 978 919 non-overlapping participants, with 135 627 CVD events and 94 126 cases of all-cause mortality. Overall, 60% (95% CI: 52-68%) of included participants had good adherence (adherence ≥ 80%) to cardiovascular medications. The RRs (95% CI) of development of CVD in those with good vs. poor (<80%) adherence were 0.85 (0.81-0.89) and 0.81 (0.76-0.86) for statins and antihypertensive medications, respectively. Corresponding RRs of all-cause mortality were 0.55 (0.46-0.67) and 0.71 (0.64-0.78) for good adherence to statins and antihypertensive agents. These associations remained consistent across subgroups representing different study characteristics. Estimated absolute risk differences for any CVD associated with poor medication adherence were 13 cases for any vascular medication, 9 cases for statins and 13 cases for antihypertensive agents, per 100 000 individuals per year.

conclusionA substantial proportion of people do not adhere adequately to cardiovascular medications, and the prevalence of suboptimal adherence is similar across all individual CVD medications. Absolute and relative risk assessments demonstrate that a considerable proportion of all CVD events (~9% in Europe) could be attributed to poor adherence to vascular medications alone, and that the level of optimal adherence confers a significant inverse association with subsequent adverse outcomes. Measures to enhance adherence to help maximize the potentials of effective cardiac therapies in the clinical setting are urgently required.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAdultAgedCardiovascular AgentsCardiovascular DiseasesCause of DeathEpidemiologic MethodsHumansMiddle AgedYoung AdultCardiovascular AgentsCardiovascular diseaseMedication adherence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.