Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23907126›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2013

Heritable one-hit events defining cancer prevention?

Levy Kopelovich, Brittney Shea-Herbert

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Levy KopelovichDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. kopelovichl@gmail.com
Brittney Shea-Herbert
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over 100 years ago (1902-1914) Theodor Boveri suggested a role for mutations in cancer. Boveri's ideas were derived from the then "just-emerging" chromosome theory of inheritance. While demonstrating chromosomal aberrations as a cause of genetic imbalance, Boveri suggested that possible causes of malignancy may include events such as aneuploidy that are now defined as gene mutations, asserting all the while that malignancy occurs at the cellular level. Indeed, studies to date essentially uniformly show that cancer is a genetic disease.

Indexed as

Genes, Tumor SuppressorModels, BiologicalCarcinogenesisGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansInheritance PatternsMutationNeoplasmscancer preventioncancer syndromesdriver mutationsKnudsonone-hitpassenger mutationstwo-hit

Identifiers

PMID23907126
PMCPMC3865044
OpenAlexW2032631404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.