Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23904858›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in urology2013

Diagnosis and office-based treatment of urinary incontinence in adults. Part two: treatment.

Anne P Cameron, Masahito Jimbo, Joel J Heidelbaugh

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in urology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anne P CameronUniversity of Michigan Department of Urology, 3875 Taubman Center, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5330, USA.
Masahito Jimbo
Joel J Heidelbaugh
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USA. Alfred Taubman Health Care Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urinary incontinence is a common problem in both men and women. In this review article we address treatment of the various forms of incontinence with conservative treatments, medical therapy, devices and surgery. The US Preventive Services Task Force, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and PubMed were reviewed for articles focusing on urinary incontinence. Conservative therapy with education, fluid and food management, weight loss, timed voiding and pelvic floor physical therapy are all simple office-based treatments for incontinence. Medical therapy for incontinence currently is only available for urgency incontinence in the form of anticholinergic medication. Condom catheters, penile clamps, urethral inserts and pessaries can be helpful in specific situations. Surgical therapies vary depending on the type of incontinence, but are typically offered if conservative measures fail.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-3 Receptor Agonistsbladder retraininglower urinary tract symptomsmuscarinic antagonistsoveractive urinary bladderpelvic floor physical therapypessariesstress urinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID23904858
PMCPMC3721442
OpenAlexW2082541434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.