ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2013
Exercise and nutrition interventions in advanced lung cancer: a systematic review.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recommendations for Interventions to Improve Function in Patients With Lung Cancer: A Clinical Practice Guideline.Cancer medicine · 2025Guideline
- The Effect of Exercise and Nutritional Interventions on Body Composition in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Cancer: A Systematic Review.Nutrients · 2022Pooled it
- The Facts about Food after Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review of Prospective Cohort Studies.Nutrients · 2020Pooled it
- Exercise training for advanced lung cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- The management strategies of cancer-associated anorexia: a critical appraisal of systematic reviews.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Effects of Supervised Multimodal Exercise Interventions on Cancer-Related Fatigue: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.BioMed research international · 2015Pooled it
- Trial
- A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial to Study the Impact of a Nutrition-Sensitive Intervention on Adult Women With Cancer Cachexia Undergoing Palliative Care in India.Integrative cancer therapies · 2017Trial
- Impact of Exclusive Adjuvant Radiotherapy on Fatigue and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer: A Prospective Clinical Study.Cancers · 2026Article
- Personalized Combined Nutrition & Exercise Intervention in Newly Diagnosed Cancer Patients - a Trial Protocol.Future science OA · 2025Article
- Dietary Counseling Outcomes in Patients with Lung Cancer in an Upper-Middle-Income Country: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Pain and Coping Strategies as Determinants of Malnutrition Risk in Lung Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Influence of Amino Acids and Exercise on Muscle Protein Turnover, Particularly in Cancer Cachexia.Cancers · 2024Review
- The Best Supportive Care in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Review
- Cancer-related Fatigue in Lung Cancer: A Research Agenda: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Comparative effectiveness of smartphone healthcare applications for improving quality of life in lung cancer patients: study protocol.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2022Article
- Clinical importance of preoperative red-cell volume distribution width as a prognostic marker in patients undergoing radical surgery for pancreatic cancer.Surgery today · 2022Article
- Aberrant mitochondrial homeostasis at the crossroad of musculoskeletal ageing and non-small cell lung cancer.PloS one · 2022Article
- Feasibility of a multimodal exercise, nutrition, and palliative care intervention in advanced lung cancer.BMC cancer · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledIn this systematic review, we sought to evaluate the effect of physical activity or nutrition interventions (or both) in adults with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc).
methodsA systematic search for relevant clinical trials was conducted in 6 electronic databases, by hand searching, and by contacting key investigators. No limits were placed on study language. Information about recruitment rates, protocol adherence, patient-reported and clinical outcome measures, and study conclusions was extracted. Methodologic quality and risk of bias in each study was assessed using validated tools. MAIN
resultsSix papers detailing five studies involving 203 participants met the inclusion criteria. Two of the studies were single-cohort physical activity studies (54 participants), and three were controlled nutrition studies (149 participants). All were conducted in an outpatient setting. None of the included studies combined physical activity with nutrition interventions.
conclusionsOur systematic review suggests that exercise and nutrition interventions are not harmful and may have beneficial effects on unintentional weight loss, physical strength, and functional performance in patients with advanced nsclc. However, the observed improvements must be interpreted with caution, because findings were not consistent across the included studies. Moreover, the included studies were small and at significant risk of bias. More research is required to ascertain the optimal physical activity and nutrition interventions in advanced inoperable nsclc. Specifically, the potential benefits of combining physical activity with nutrition counselling have yet to be adequately explored in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.