ArticleThe Journal of manual & manipulative therapy2012
Spinal manual therapy interventions for pediatric patients: a systematic review.
Article in The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02111278 (Lumbar Manipulation and Exercise for the Treatment of Acute Low Back Pain in Adolescents), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Lumbar Manipulation and Exercise for the Treatment of Acute Low Back Pain in Adolescents: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Screening for red flags and modifying manual therapy techniques for pediatric patients.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Chiropractic Care in Children: A Review of Evidence and Safety.Clinical pediatrics · 2025Review
- Spinal manipulation and mobilisation in the treatment of infants, children, and adolescents: a systematic scoping review.BMC pediatrics · 2022Article
- How frequent are non-evidence-based health care beliefs in chiropractic students and do they vary across the pre-professional educational years.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2018Article
- The effectiveness of manual physical therapy interventions in pediatric patients with anterior hip pain: a retrospective study.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2017Article
- Conservative care with or without manipulative therapy in the management of back and neck pain in Danish children aged 9-15. Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2016Article
- Lumbar manipulation and exercise for the treatment of acute low back pain in adolescents: a randomized controlled trial.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2015Article
- Content and bibliometric analyses of the Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAlthough much has been written about the efficacy of manual therapy interventions for adults with headaches or spinal pain, little research has focused on the use of these interventions in pediatric patients. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence for spinal manual therapy (SMT) interventions in patients 4-17 years old with headaches and/or mechanical spinal pain.
methodsA search for relevant studies published in the past 15 years was conducted on MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Randomized Control Trials, PEDro, PubMed, and Sports Discus. Only English language articles were reviewed. Studies had to include at least one outcome measure for pain, function, or quality of life. Studies evaluating post-operative interventions, or those in which the interventions were directed at influencing excessive spinal curvatures, were excluded. Case reports and studies that did not limit analysis of the results to the pediatric population were also excluded.
resultsTwo randomized control trials and two studies offering lower levels of evidence were identified in the literature search. The latter studies were prospective cohort studies. The four studies were evaluated using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria. DISCUSSION: There are very little data in the literature to support or refute the use of SMT interventions in pediatric patients. Further research is required to establish a strong evidence-based foundation for use of these interventions in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.