Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23904676›Full record

Trial reportSleep2013

Randomized controlled trial of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) versus servoventilation in patients with CPAP-induced central sleep apnea (complex sleep apnea).

Dominic Dellweg, Jens Kerl, Ekkehard Hoehn, Markus Wenzel, Dieter Koehler

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sleep, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A novel adaptive servoventilation (ASVAuto) for the treatment of central sleep apnea associated with chronic use of opioids.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2014
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Insights, recommendations, and research priorities for central sleep apnea: report from an expert panel.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Central sleep apnoea: not just one phenotype.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Sleep-Related Breathing Disorders: When CPAP Is Not Enough.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2021
    Review
  12. Central sleep apnoea and periodic breathing in heart failure: prognostic significance and treatment options.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Complex sleep apnea syndrome.Sleep disorders · 2014
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Noninvasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2014
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dominic DellwegKloster Grafschaft, Pulmonary Medicine I, Home Mechanical Ventilation Unit and Sleep Laboratory, Schmallenberg, Germany. d.dellweg@fkkg.de
Jens Kerl
Ekkehard Hoehn
Markus Wenzel
Dieter Koehler

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesTo compare the treatment effect of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) and anticyclic servoventilation in patients with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)-induced central sleep apnea (complex sleep apnea).

designRandomized controlled trial.

settingSleep center. PATIENTS: Thirty patients who developed complex sleep apnea syndrome (CompSAS) during CPAP treatment.

interventionsNPPV or servoventilation. MEASUREMENTS AND

resultsPatients were randomized to NPPV or servo-ventilation. Full polysomnography (PSG) was performed after 6 weeks. On CPAP prior to randomization, patients in the NPPV and servoventilator arm had comparable apnea-hypopnea indices (AHI, 28.6 ± 6.5 versus 27.7 ± 9.7 events/h (mean ± standard deviation [SD])), apnea indices (AI,19 ± 5.6 versus 21.1 ± 8.6 events/h), central apnea indices (CAI, 16.7 ± 5.4 versus 18.2 ± 7.1 events/h), oxygen desaturation indices (ODI,17.5 ± 13.1 versus 24.3 ± 11.9 events/h). During initial titration NPPV and servoventilation significantly improved the AHI (9.1 ± 4.3 versus 9 ± 6.4 events/h), AI (2 ± 3.1 versus 3.5 ± 4.5 events/h) CAI (2 ± 3.1 versus 2.5 ± 3.9 events/h) and ODI (10.1 ± 4.5 versus 8.9 ± 8.4 events/h) when compared to CPAP treatment (all P < 0.05). After 6 weeks we observed the following differences: AHI (16.5 ± 8 versus 7.4 ± 4.2 events/h, P = 0.027), AI (10.4 ± 5.9 versus 1.7 ± 1.9 events/h, P = 0.001), CAI (10.2 ± 5.1 versus 1.5 ± 1.7 events/h, P < 0.0001)) and ODI (21.1 ± 9.2 versus 4.8 ± 3.4 events/h, P < 0.0001) for NPPV and servoventilation, respectively. Other sleep parameters were unaffected by any form of treatment.

conclusionsAfter 6 weeks, servoventilation treated respiratory events more effectively than NPPV in patients with complex sleep apnea syndrome.

Indexed as

Continuous Positive Airway PressureFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolysomnographyPositive-Pressure RespirationSleep Apnea, CentralSleep Apnea, Obstructivecentral sleep apneacomplex sleep apneaCPAPNPPVservo-ventilation

Identifiers

PMID23904676
PMCPMC3700713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.