Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23904153›Full record

ReviewThe AAPS journal2013

Epigenetic cancer prevention mechanisms in skin cancer.

Kamalika Saha, Thomas J Hornyak, Richard L Eckert

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The AAPS journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Phytochemicals as Immunomodulatory Agents in Melanoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Chemopreventive activity of sulforaphane.Drug design, development and therapy · 2018
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kamalika SahaDepartments of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 108 N. Greene Street, Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, USA.
Thomas J Hornyak
Richard L Eckert
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND GREENEBAUM CANCER CENTERSUPPORT GRANTP30CA134274 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI FEYRUZ VIRGILIA RASSOOL · 2008 to 2026
$51.0M
Polycomb proteins and skin cancer preventionR01CA131074 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI ECKERT, RICHARD L. · 2008 to 2017
$4.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA134274NCI NIH HHS R01 CA131074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetics is an important emerging area for study of mechanisms of cancer prevention. In recent years, it has been realized that cancer prevention agents, derived from natural dietary sources, impact cancer cell survival by modulating epigenetic processes. In the present manuscript, we review key epigenetic regulatory mechanisms and examine the impact of sulforaphane and green tea polyphenols on these processes. We also discuss available information on the epigenetics in the context of skin cancer. These studies indicate that diet-derived chemopreventive agents modulate DNA methylation status and histone modification via multiple processes and point to additional areas for study of epigenetic mechanisms in skin cancer.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnticarcinogenic AgentsEpigenesis, GeneticHumansIsothiocyanatesPolyphenolsSkin NeoplasmsSulfoxidesAnticarcinogenic AgentsIsothiocyanatesPolyphenolssulforaphaneSulfoxides

Identifiers

PMID23904153
PMCPMC3787232
OpenAlexW2057470397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.