ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2013
Evaluation of hypertension in children.
Review in Current hypertension reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inadequate sleep is a risk factor for pediatric hypertension: the pathophysiologic and socioeconomic correlates.Pediatric research · 2026Review
- Factors Related to Hypertension in Pediatric Patients Who Do Not Have Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Retrospective Chart Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Cardiovascular Risks of Hypertension: Lessons from Children with Chronic Kidney Disease.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Evaluation and Management of Stage 2 Hypertension in Pediatric Patients.Current hypertension reports · 2018Review
- Review of Pediatric Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2017Review
- Risk Factors in Adolescent Hypertension.Global pediatric health · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypertension is an important public health problem, and increasingly children are being diagnosed with primary hypertension. As the list of secondary causes of hypertension is extensive, pediatric practitioners increasingly need to decide on investigations needed for evaluating children presenting with high blood pressure. The differentiation between primary and secondary hypertension is paramount to understanding this important health issue, since many forms of secondary hypertension require specific treatment. The review evaluates the current available guidelines and practice patterns for evaluating children with elevated blood pressure. The review also aims to provide a framework for cost-effective evaluation strategies for children with elevated blood pressure based on current recommendations and evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23904150What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.